<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First play with Valhalla Knights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.siliconera.com/2007/02/19/first-play-with-valhalla-knights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.siliconera.com/2007/02/19/first-play-with-valhalla-knights/</link>
	<description>The secret level in the world of video game news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:55:15 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie Montminy</title>
		<link>http://www.siliconera.com/2007/02/19/first-play-with-valhalla-knights/comment-page-1/#comment-67797</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie Montminy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 19:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/index.php/2007/02/19/first-play-with-valhalla-knights/#comment-67797</guid>
		<description>Marvelous has cranked out better. This I know as a fan of the Harvest Moon series, which seem to have been decently budgeted, or else programmed by extremely skilled slaves. 

I keep those things in mind, but you have to be realistic: this is a competitive market with big budgets behind most of the better games, and so your product is going to be correspondingly compared. It&#039;s not a very fun game, and throwing Valhalla in there to ride on teh coattails of the likes of Valkyrie should not be the way to attract people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marvelous has cranked out better. This I know as a fan of the Harvest Moon series, which seem to have been decently budgeted, or else programmed by extremely skilled slaves. </p>
<p>I keep those things in mind, but you have to be realistic: this is a competitive market with big budgets behind most of the better games, and so your product is going to be correspondingly compared. It&#8217;s not a very fun game, and throwing Valhalla in there to ride on teh coattails of the likes of Valkyrie should not be the way to attract people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JeremyR</title>
		<link>http://www.siliconera.com/2007/02/19/first-play-with-valhalla-knights/comment-page-1/#comment-50506</link>
		<dc:creator>JeremyR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 23:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/index.php/2007/02/19/first-play-with-valhalla-knights/#comment-50506</guid>
		<description>Despite the name, it&#039;s not Norse. So I don&#039;t see why you are comparing it to Valkyrie Profile. Also, bear in mind that while it might be on a platform more powerful than the PS1, it&#039;s from an extremely small developer with no budget, until VP:L which was from Tri-Ace and published by Squenix.

Secondly, I think it&#039;s somewhat silly criticizing the game because some character class combinations aren&#039;t viable - especially having two fighters.   Most RPGs require at least a basic mix of classes - fighter (or tank), healer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite the name, it&#8217;s not Norse. So I don&#8217;t see why you are comparing it to Valkyrie Profile. Also, bear in mind that while it might be on a platform more powerful than the PS1, it&#8217;s from an extremely small developer with no budget, until VP:L which was from Tri-Ace and published by Squenix.</p>
<p>Secondly, I think it&#8217;s somewhat silly criticizing the game because some character class combinations aren&#8217;t viable &#8211; especially having two fighters.   Most RPGs require at least a basic mix of classes &#8211; fighter (or tank), healer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
