Although I’m not officially a pro, I can analyze you:

I’m not calling you a rambler because I need an excuse to win this argument, because:

1. YOU DO RAMBLE

2. The simple fact of the matter is I already won it, whether you can comprehend, or accept it, is of no significance.

Even (and I do push the word even) if you have won this debate, going around telling the other guy to shut up because you are the victor is a clear sign of insecurity. And for the last time, I don’t ramble. I talk a lot, but I don’t talk for nothing. I think you simply don’t like to read to much, so whatever is to long for you is rambling.

You clearly didn’t follow my advice. :(

I answered your question as simply as I could. The only reason you are saying this is because it’s not the answer you wanted to hear.

P.S. If it makes you feel better, your welcome to make a final quip.

See now this is where the delusion comes in strong. In this phrase, you are stating that your someone important and that you are giving me a privilege to me by allowing me to reply to you. Alex, you’re not important, on the Internet, you’re just another user. What do you do or say will not change anything and if you were to stop visiting (let’s say you get hit by a car), the world and the Internet will keep on turning. So no, I will not stop replying and not, I will not keep my comments to myself and no, I don’t think I’m wrong and you know you what, there’s nothing you can do. On the Internet, you are nothing and can do nothing (well except for flaming, but no one ever dies from being flamed to death).

Hope that clears up a few things for you

Although I’m not officially a pro, I can analyze you:

I’m not calling you a rambler because I need an excuse to win this argument, because:

1. YOU DO RAMBLE

2. The simple fact of the matter is I already won it, whether you can comprehend, or accept it, is of no significance.

Even (and I do push the word even) if you have won this debate, going around telling the other guy to shut up because you are the victor is a clear sign of insecurity. And for the last time, I don’t ramble. I talk a lot, but I don’t talk for nothing. I think you simply don’t like to read to much, so whatever is to long for you is rambling.

You clearly didn’t follow my advice. :(

I answered your question as simply as I could. The only reason you are saying this is because it’s not the answer you wanted to hear.

P.S. If it makes you feel better, your welcome to make a final quip.

See now this is where the delusion comes in strong. In this phrase, you are stating that your someone important and that you are giving me a privilege to me by allowing me to reply to you. Alex, you’re not important, on the Internet, you’re just another user. What do you do or say will not change anything and if you were to stop visiting (let’s say you get hit by a car), the world and the Internet will keep on turning. So no, I will not stop replying and not, I will not keep my comments to myself and no, I don’t think I’m wrong and you know you what, there’s nothing you can do. On the Internet, you are nothing and can do nothing (well except for flaming, but no one ever dies from being flamed to death).

Hope that clears up a few things for you

Although I’m not officially a pro, I can analyze you:

I’m not calling you a rambler because I need an excuse to win this argument, because:

1. YOU DO RAMBLE

2. The simple fact of the matter is I already won it, whether you can comprehend, or accept it, is of no significance.

Even (and I do push the word even) if you have won this debate, going around telling the other guy to shut up because you are the victor is a clear sign of insecurity. And for the last time, I don’t ramble. I talk a lot, but I don’t talk for nothing. I think you simply don’t like to read to much, so whatever is to long for you is rambling.

You clearly didn’t follow my advice. :(

I answered your question as simply as I could. The only reason you are saying this is because it’s not the answer you wanted to hear.

P.S. If it makes you feel better, your welcome to make a final quip.

See now this is where the delusion comes in strong. In this phrase, you are stating that your someone important and that you are giving me a privilege to me by allowing me to reply to you. Alex, you’re not important, on the Internet, you’re just another user. What do you do or say will not change anything and if you were to stop visiting (let’s say you get hit by a car), the world and the Internet will keep on turning. So no, I will not stop replying and not, I will not keep my comments to myself and no, I don’t think I’m wrong and you know you what, there’s nothing you can do. On the Internet, you are nothing and can do nothing (well except for flaming, but no one ever dies from being flamed to death).

Hope that clears up a few things for you

1. YOU DO RAMBLE

2. The simple fact of the matter is I already won it, whether you can comprehend, or accept it, is of no significance.

“If you reply, please address the specific points I made, instead of sidestepping them, or going off-topic, as you seem fond of doing. And please, oh please, stop rambling. Thank you.”

You clearly didn’t follow my advice. :(

P.S. If it makes you feel better, your welcome to make a final quip.

1. YOU DO RAMBLE

2. The simple fact of the matter is I already won it, whether you can comprehend, or accept it, is of no significance.

“If you reply, please address the specific points I made, instead of sidestepping them, or going off-topic, as you seem fond of doing. And please, oh please, stop rambling. Thank you.”

You clearly didn’t follow my advice. :(

P.S. If it makes you feel better, your welcome to make a final quip.

1. YOU DO RAMBLE

2. The simple fact of the matter is I already won it, whether you can comprehend, or accept it, is of no significance.

“If you reply, please address the specific points I made, instead of sidestepping them, or going off-topic, as you seem fond of doing. And please, oh please, stop rambling. Thank you.”

You clearly didn’t follow my advice. :(

P.S. If it makes you feel better, your welcome to make a final quip.

And enough about the “More rambling” statements. I don’t ramble, you’re just looking for excuses not to answer things you don’t understand or that can put you in a bad situation.

FIXED

FIXED

FIXED

The point, like I’ve been stating since the beginning of this, is that it’s not to the standards of a hardcore gaming website. Plain in simple, is that so hard to understand? You find things like that on IGN, not in places like this. Again, no offense to Spencer, his heart is in the right place, but he’s getting played by EA.

Do you not understand the point of what I was saying? You address my point about *Siliconera ocassionally covering bad games*, by bringing up the potential for a game or movie turning out bad or good. More rambling…

Yes I understand your pointless point, but did you understood what I just said?

This is what proves to me you’re not to smart. As I had REITERATED, the jist of my point was that developers should release their game around the time of the movie, so they make more money. But what do you do, you once again dismiss that, and focus on the stupid hype thing…AGAIN, why do you sidestep? Wait, I know why, it’s because you said in your first or 2nd post that they could release their movie-based games a year later. Which is stupid move financially, since people usually want the game around the time of the movie release, which is proven by sales, understand grasshopper? Yes, they’re cashing in the hype of the movie, it’s freakin obvious(oooh, I could say that in one sentence, instead of rambling about McDonalds)

It’s ironic that you say that I’m not smart because you’re starting to sound like dumbass here man. What you just said is the f#$@ing definition of HYPE. Here, from Wikipedia:

In show business, hyperbole (known as hype or media hype) is the practice of spending money on public relations in an attempt to bolster public interest in (for example) a movie, television show, or performing artist. Often the entertainment value of the thing being hyped is exaggerated. Consequently, hype (but not traditional, literate hyperbole) has a bad connotation.

Wow. Do you know how stupid a question that is? I proudly buy all kinds of games, including movie-based ones. Why would anyone expect someone to buy just movie-based games, and not other types. I don’t have a large budget, but I sooner or later buy any game I want. OMG, someone can buy both movie-based games and other genre games as well, *gasps*, what’s the world coming to?

Then you’re saying that you have the budget to buy every game that you want, told you, it’s one or the other. The average consumer doesn’t have the budget to buy 5 games a month, it’s 2 games a month, 3 if you’re willing to eat Kraft Dinner for a week. So good for you if you have that kind of cash, but people who don’t make 40K a year and have bills to pay will stick with the Zelda, Final Fantasy and Halo. Make sure to put enough gas in your Jaguar before going to GameStop to buy the game version of Ratatouille.

And enough about the “More rambling” statements. I ramble, you’re just looking for excuses not to answer things you don’t understand or that can put you in a bad situation.

Please, keep denying it, keep playing dumb, I don’t care. I beat you again, and you’ll probably say you couldn’t remember me sometime in the future, WHEN I DO IT AGAIN!!

Oh, so that’s how you say you beat me, buy declaring yourself the victor, now I understand. Say, if I were to live in your world and I would say that I’m a Rocket Scientist that makes 2 Millions a year, will that really happen or will it just be in my little imagination? You can’t pronounce yourself the victor, you need need someone with higher authority or superiority to do so, and that’s not you.

All in all, please tell me A GOOD REASON why Siliconera shouldn’t promote this giveaway, because them advertising the gamesn’t a good one. What is wrong with advertising the game, considering it’s a gaming site.

If you reply, please address the specific points I made, instead of sidestepping them, or going off-topic, as you seem fond of doing. And please, oh please, stop rambling. Thank you.

I’ll just copy and paste what I previously wrote in this reply: The point, like I’ve been stating since the beginning of this, is that it’s not to the standards of a hardcore gaming website. Plain in simple, is that so hard to understand? You find things like that on IGN, not in places like this. Again, no offense to Spencer, his heart is in the right place, but he’s getting played by EA.

The point, like I’ve been stating since the beginning of this, is that it’s not to the standards of a hardcore gaming website. Plain in simple, is that so hard to understand? You find things like that on IGN, not in places like this. Again, no offense to Spencer, his heart is in the right place, but he’s getting played by EA.

Do you not understand the point of what I was saying? You address my point about *Siliconera ocassionally covering bad games*, by bringing up the potential for a game or movie turning out bad or good. More rambling…

Yes I understand your pointless point, but did you understood what I just said?

This is what proves to me you’re not to smart. As I had REITERATED, the jist of my point was that developers should release their game around the time of the movie, so they make more money. But what do you do, you once again dismiss that, and focus on the stupid hype thing…AGAIN, why do you sidestep? Wait, I know why, it’s because you said in your first or 2nd post that they could release their movie-based games a year later. Which is stupid move financially, since people usually want the game around the time of the movie release, which is proven by sales, understand grasshopper? Yes, they’re cashing in the hype of the movie, it’s freakin obvious(oooh, I could say that in one sentence, instead of rambling about McDonalds)

It’s ironic that you say that I’m not smart because you’re starting to sound like dumbass here man. What you just said is the f#$@ing definition of HYPE. Here, from Wikipedia:

In show business, hyperbole (known as hype or media hype) is the practice of spending money on public relations in an attempt to bolster public interest in (for example) a movie, television show, or performing artist. Often the entertainment value of the thing being hyped is exaggerated. Consequently, hype (but not traditional, literate hyperbole) has a bad connotation.
Wow. Do you know how stupid a question that is? I proudly buy all kinds of games, including movie-based ones. Why would anyone expect someone to buy just movie-based games, and not other types. I don’t have a large budget, but I sooner or later buy any game I want. OMG, someone can buy both movie-based games and other genre games as well, *gasps*, what’s the world coming to?

Then you’re saying that you have the budget to buy every game that you want, told you, it’s one or the other. The average consumer doesn’t have the budget to buy 5 games a month, it’s 2 games a month, 3 if you’re willing to eat Kraft Dinner for a week. So good for you if you have that kind of cash, but people who don’t make 40K a year and have bills to pay will stick with the Zelda, Final Fantasy and Halo. Make sure to put enough gas in your Jaguar before going to GameStop to buy the game version of Ratatouille.

And enough about the “More rambling” statements. I ramble, you’re just looking for excuses not to answer things you don’t understand or that can put you in a bad situation.

Please, keep denying it, keep playing dumb, I don’t care. I beat you again, and you’ll probably say you couldn’t remember me sometime in the future, WHEN I DO IT AGAIN!!

Oh, so that’s how you say you beat me, buy declaring yourself the victor, now I understand. Say, if I were to live in your world and I would say that I’m a Rocket Scientist that makes 2 Millions a year, will that really happen or will it just be in my little imagination? You can’t pronounce yourself the victor, you need need someone with higher authority or superiority to do so, and that’s not you.

All in all, please tell me A GOOD REASON why Siliconera shouldn’t promote this giveaway, because them advertising the gamesn’t a good one. What is wrong with advertising the game, considering it’s a gaming site.

If you reply, please address the specific points I made, instead of sidestepping them, or going off-topic, as you seem fond of doing. And please, oh please, stop rambling. Thank you.

I’ll just copy and paste what I previously wrote in this reply: The point, like I’ve been stating since the beginning of this, is that it’s not to the standards of a hardcore gaming website. Plain in simple, is that so hard to understand? You find things like that on IGN, not in places like this. Again, no offense to Spencer, his heart is in the right place, but he’s getting played by EA.

The point, like I’ve been stating since the beginning of this, is that it’s not to the standards of a hardcore gaming website. Plain in simple, is that so hard to understand? You find things like that on IGN, not in places like this. Again, no offense to Spencer, his heart is in the right place, but he’s getting played by EA.

Do you not understand the point of what I was saying? You address my point about *Siliconera ocassionally covering bad games*, by bringing up the potential for a game or movie turning out bad or good. More rambling…

Yes I understand your pointless point, but did you understood what I just said?

This is what proves to me you’re not to smart. As I had REITERATED, the jist of my point was that developers should release their game around the time of the movie, so they make more money. But what do you do, you once again dismiss that, and focus on the stupid hype thing…AGAIN, why do you sidestep? Wait, I know why, it’s because you said in your first or 2nd post that they could release their movie-based games a year later. Which is stupid move financially, since people usually want the game around the time of the movie release, which is proven by sales, understand grasshopper? Yes, they’re cashing in the hype of the movie, it’s freakin obvious(oooh, I could say that in one sentence, instead of rambling about McDonalds)

It’s ironic that you say that I’m not smart because you’re starting to sound like dumbass here man. What you just said is the f#$@ing definition of HYPE. Here, from Wikipedia:

In show business, hyperbole (known as hype or media hype) is the practice of spending money on public relations in an attempt to bolster public interest in (for example) a movie, television show, or performing artist. Often the entertainment value of the thing being hyped is exaggerated. Consequently, hype (but not traditional, literate hyperbole) has a bad connotation.
Wow. Do you know how stupid a question that is? I proudly buy all kinds of games, including movie-based ones. Why would anyone expect someone to buy just movie-based games, and not other types. I don’t have a large budget, but I sooner or later buy any game I want. OMG, someone can buy both movie-based games and other genre games as well, *gasps*, what’s the world coming to?

Then you’re saying that you have the budget to buy every game that you want, told you, it’s one or the other. The average consumer doesn’t have the budget to buy 5 games a month, it’s 2 games a month, 3 if you’re willing to eat Kraft Dinner for a week. So good for you if you have that kind of cash, but people who don’t make 40K a year and have bills to pay will stick with the Zelda, Final Fantasy and Halo. Make sure to put enough gas in your Jaguar before going to GameStop to buy the game version of Ratatouille.

And enough about the “More rambling” statements. I ramble, you’re just looking for excuses not to answer things you don’t understand or that can put you in a bad situation.

Please, keep denying it, keep playing dumb, I don’t care. I beat you again, and you’ll probably say you couldn’t remember me sometime in the future, WHEN I DO IT AGAIN!!

Oh, so that’s how you say you beat me, buy declaring yourself the victor, now I understand. Say, if I were to live in your world and I would say that I’m a Rocket Scientist that makes 2 Millions a year, will that really happen or will it just be in my little imagination? You can’t pronounce yourself the victor, you need need someone with higher authority or superiority to do so, and that’s not you.

All in all, please tell me A GOOD REASON why Siliconera shouldn’t promote this giveaway, because them advertising the gamesn’t a good one. What is wrong with advertising the game, considering it’s a gaming site.

If you reply, please address the specific points I made, instead of sidestepping them, or going off-topic, as you seem fond of doing. And please, oh please, stop rambling. Thank you.

I’ll just copy and paste what I previously wrote in this reply: The point, like I’ve been stating since the beginning of this, is that it’s not to the standards of a hardcore gaming website. Plain in simple, is that so hard to understand? You find things like that on IGN, not in places like this. Again, no offense to Spencer, his heart is in the right place, but he’s getting played by EA.

“Man, by the time we’re done with this topic, you’ll have learned a lot about marketing. When a company gives out freebies to the website or TV Show, they expect them to give them out to the audience, that my friend, is advertising, more precisely, FREE advertising. How does it work? Simple, if EA for example, keeps giving Spencer freebies to give out to us, some members might keep this in mind the next time they’re at Wal-Mart or GameStop, not knowing what to pick up to blow a few days of boredom. Keep in mind grasshopper, when it comes to business, there’s no such thing as charity, every move has a purpose. Giving a few games to Spencer is like giving him $5 worth of plastic. In exchange for the publicity he’s making (unintentionally), that’s like trading 10 apples for a car.”

Yes, EA is trying to advertise the game, but who cares? Thre are ads all over this ex. dating ones. (what does that have to do with videogames?) Really, what’s the problem with them advertising their game? You said in your previous post that it’s because movie-based games usually suck, but that’s a stupid reason.

“Don’t recall any title of the past, but if it helps to clear something out, there’s a difference between a title that has the potential to be good and a title that never had any. No one expect a license movie game to be good, but we could expect a SquareEnix RPG to be good. If a SquareEnix RPG fails, well that’s that, it had the potential, but didn’t live up to the hype. Now let’s see what’s movie is coming soon… ah yes, Rush Hour 3. I don’t know if they plan to make a game out of this movie, but I think we can all agree that if they do, it will most likely suck and it probably won’t have”

Do you not understand the point of what I was saying? You address my point about *Siliconera ocassionally covering bad games*, by bringing up the potential for a game or movie turning out bad or good. More rambling…

“Sure sounds like what you said. But regardless if you didn’t mean that, fact is, this is how it works. For the same reason a new game based on the 4th Harry P. movie wouldn’t sale that well if released now, this new game wouldn’t do better next year. IT IS all about the Hype! Why do you think McDonald’s only releases movies toys before a movie comes out? Because of the Hype. Why does BestBuy displays the Transformers movie game on their promotional HD TVs? Because of the Hype. Hype is the ultimate tool for advertising, it spreads like a super virus and it’s the topic of a lot of discussions”

This is what proves to me you’re not to smart. As I had REITERATED, the jist of my point was that developers should release their game around the time of the movie, so they make more money. But what do you do, you once again dismiss that, and focus on the stupid hype thing…AGAIN, why do you sidestep? Wait, I know why, it’s because you said in your first or 2nd post that they could release their movie-based games a year later. Which is stupid move financially, since people usually want the game around the time of the movie release, which is proven by sales, understand grasshopper? Yes, they’re cashing in the hype of the movie, it’s freakin obvious(oooh, I could say that in one sentence, instead of rambling about McDonalds)

“It’s just that the only other possibility would have been that you only bought these kind of games instead of grade A titles. So which is it? Do you have the budget to buy every games you want or do you only buy movie and TV licensed games?

Wow. Do you know how stupid a question that is? I proudly buy all kinds of games, including movie-based ones. Why would anyone expect someone to buy just movie-based games, and not other types. I don’t have a large budget, but I sooner or later buy any game I want. OMG, someone can buy both movie-based games and other genre games as well, *gasps*, what’s the world coming to?

“Yes I do have a bad memory, more precisely, it’s called a Selective Memory. My brain basically flushes out what it find to be of no use (no offense). Some people see this as an inconvenient, I see this as an advantage for 2 reasons:

1- We get distracted by our good memories everyday, even more for people with ADD such as myself. I can’t imagine how annoying it would be to be distracted by useless memories while trying to remove the jumpers of a HardDrive while it’s still in the computer with all the IDE and Power cables still attached.

2- As much as I love debating, I know that it serves me no real purpose, I mean at the end of the day, no cares but me. So ya, I don’t recall if we had debates last month or last week but I do know this, if I were to actually remember you or the discussions we had, what would it say about me. I would sound like a looser who has nothing more important to remember. ”

MORE RAMBLING….

“The times that you claim to have “beaten my ass” must have been important days for you to remember them but for me,”

Please, keep denying it, keep playing dumb, I don’t care. I beat you again, and you’ll probably say you couldn’t remember me sometime in the future, WHEN I DO IT AGAIN!!

All in all, please tell me A GOOD REASON why Siliconera shouldn’t promote this giveaway, because them advertising the gamesn’t a good one. What is wrong with advertising the game, considering it’s a gaming site.

If you reply, please address the specific points I made, instead of sidestepping them, or going off-topic, as you seem fond of doing. And please, oh please, stop rambling. Thank you.

“Man, by the time we’re done with this topic, you’ll have learned a lot about marketing. When a company gives out freebies to the website or TV Show, they expect them to give them out to the audience, that my friend, is advertising, more precisely, FREE advertising. How does it work? Simple, if EA for example, keeps giving Spencer freebies to give out to us, some members might keep this in mind the next time they’re at Wal-Mart or GameStop, not knowing what to pick up to blow a few days of boredom. Keep in mind grasshopper, when it comes to business, there’s no such thing as charity, every move has a purpose. Giving a few games to Spencer is like giving him $5 worth of plastic. In exchange for the publicity he’s making (unintentionally), that’s like trading 10 apples for a car.”

Yes, EA is trying to advertise the game, but who cares? Thre are ads all over this ex. dating ones. (what does that have to do with videogames?) Really, what’s the problem with them advertising their game? You said in your previous post that it’s because movie-based games usually suck, but that’s a stupid reason.

“Don’t recall any title of the past, but if it helps to clear something out, there’s a difference between a title that has the potential to be good and a title that never had any. No one expect a license movie game to be good, but we could expect a SquareEnix RPG to be good. If a SquareEnix RPG fails, well that’s that, it had the potential, but didn’t live up to the hype. Now let’s see what’s movie is coming soon… ah yes, Rush Hour 3. I don’t know if they plan to make a game out of this movie, but I think we can all agree that if they do, it will most likely suck and it probably won’t have”

Do you not understand the point of what I was saying? You address my point about *Siliconera ocassionally covering bad games*, by bringing up the potential for a game or movie turning out bad or good. More rambling…

“Sure sounds like what you said. But regardless if you didn’t mean that, fact is, this is how it works. For the same reason a new game based on the 4th Harry P. movie wouldn’t sale that well if released now, this new game wouldn’t do better next year. IT IS all about the Hype! Why do you think McDonald’s only releases movies toys before a movie comes out? Because of the Hype. Why does BestBuy displays the Transformers movie game on their promotional HD TVs? Because of the Hype. Hype is the ultimate tool for advertising, it spreads like a super virus and it’s the topic of a lot of discussions”

This is what proves to me you’re not to smart. As I had REITERATED, the jist of my point was that developers should release their game around the time of the movie, so they make more money. But what do you do, you once again dismiss that, and focus on the stupid hype thing…AGAIN, why do you sidestep? Wait, I know why, it’s because you said in your first or 2nd post that they could release their movie-based games a year later. Which is stupid move financially, since people usually want the game around the time of the movie release, which is proven by sales, understand grasshopper? Yes, they’re cashing in the hype of the movie, it’s freakin obvious(oooh, I could say that in one sentence, instead of rambling about McDonalds)

“It’s just that the only other possibility would have been that you only bought these kind of games instead of grade A titles. So which is it? Do you have the budget to buy every games you want or do you only buy movie and TV licensed games?

Wow. Do you know how stupid a question that is? I proudly buy all kinds of games, including movie-based ones. Why would anyone expect someone to buy just movie-based games, and not other types. I don’t have a large budget, but I sooner or later buy any game I want. OMG, someone can buy both movie-based games and other genre games as well, *gasps*, what’s the world coming to?

“Yes I do have a bad memory, more precisely, it’s called a Selective Memory. My brain basically flushes out what it find to be of no use (no offense). Some people see this as an inconvenient, I see this as an advantage for 2 reasons:

1- We get distracted by our good memories everyday, even more for people with ADD such as myself. I can’t imagine how annoying it would be to be distracted by useless memories while trying to remove the jumpers of a HardDrive while it’s still in the computer with all the IDE and Power cables still attached.

2- As much as I love debating, I know that it serves me no real purpose, I mean at the end of the day, no cares but me. So ya, I don’t recall if we had debates last month or last week but I do know this, if I were to actually remember you or the discussions we had, what would it say about me. I would sound like a looser who has nothing more important to remember. ”

MORE RAMBLING….

“The times that you claim to have “beaten my ass” must have been important days for you to remember them but for me,”

Please, keep denying it, keep playing dumb, I don’t care. I beat you again, and you’ll probably say you couldn’t remember me sometime in the future, WHEN I DO IT AGAIN!!

All in all, please tell me A GOOD REASON why Siliconera shouldn’t promote this giveaway, because them advertising the gamesn’t a good one. What is wrong with advertising the game, considering it’s a gaming site.

If you reply, please address the specific points I made, instead of sidestepping them, or going off-topic, as you seem fond of doing. And please, oh please, stop rambling. Thank you.

proceed with your rambling…

So is this how you claim to have won the other debates? Help me out here, I don’t recall.