<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Square Enix Developing Another Dragon Quest Spin-off?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.siliconera.com/2009/04/28/square-enix-developing-another-dragon-quest-spin-off/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2009/04/28/square-enix-developing-another-dragon-quest-spin-off/</link> <description>The secret level in the world of video game news.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 01:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Mazen</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2009/04/28/square-enix-developing-another-dragon-quest-spin-off/comment-page-1/#comment-614833</link> <dc:creator>Mazen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:28:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=34365#comment-614833</guid> <description>Now this is interesting, I need to know what it is now!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now this is interesting, I need to know what it is now!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mazen</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2009/04/28/square-enix-developing-another-dragon-quest-spin-off/comment-page-1/#comment-567999</link> <dc:creator>Mazen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 04:28:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=34365#comment-567999</guid> <description>Now this is interesting, I need to know what it is now!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now this is interesting, I need to know what it is now!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jw</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2009/04/28/square-enix-developing-another-dragon-quest-spin-off/comment-page-1/#comment-567923</link> <dc:creator>jw</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:04:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=34365#comment-567923</guid> <description>Revision: I&#039;m not a super huge fan of the main modern, stretched out 70 hour DQ entries  (7,8.) But i enjoy the condensed titles like the 4 remake.  I had to shout out the remakes as it feels like they were checked for thoughtful item placement, etc. rather that released once the graphics were good. (Square) They don&#039;t have to do that as the DQ remakes will sell well regardless...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Revision: I&#39;m not a super huge fan of the main modern, stretched out 70 hour DQ entries  (7,8.) But i enjoy the condensed titles like the 4 remake.  I had to shout out the remakes as it feels like they were checked for thoughtful item placement, etc. rather that released once the graphics were good. (Square) They don&#39;t have to do that as the DQ remakes will sell well regardless&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anti Smile</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2009/04/28/square-enix-developing-another-dragon-quest-spin-off/comment-page-1/#comment-567916</link> <dc:creator>Anti Smile</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:11:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=34365#comment-567916</guid> <description>stupid comment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;you&#039;re not fan of the main dragon quest series, yet, you&#039;re a fan of the dragon quest remakes. the main dragon quest series games and the remake games are EXACTLY THE SAME! the dragon quest series hasn&#039;t changed in YEARS. it&#039;s never going to change and that&#039;s the way the japanese people like it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>stupid comment.</p><p>you&#39;re not fan of the main dragon quest series, yet, you&#39;re a fan of the dragon quest remakes. the main dragon quest series games and the remake games are EXACTLY THE SAME! the dragon quest series hasn&#39;t changed in YEARS. it&#39;s never going to change and that&#39;s the way the japanese people like it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anti Smile</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2009/04/28/square-enix-developing-another-dragon-quest-spin-off/comment-page-1/#comment-567917</link> <dc:creator>Anti Smile</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:09:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=34365#comment-567917</guid> <description>ooops. i&#039;m talking to user jw.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ooops. i&#39;m talking to user jw.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jarrodand</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2009/04/28/square-enix-developing-another-dragon-quest-spin-off/comment-page-1/#comment-567912</link> <dc:creator>jarrodand</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:34:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=34365#comment-567912</guid> <description>Actually, wasn&#039;t a DQ Swords sequel recently rumored?  Maybe it&#039;s that?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I sort of wonder how Horii plans to &quot;seed&quot; Wii in preparation for DQX a couple years from now?  DQVII remake?  Swords 2? Torneko 4? Monsters Battle Road?  DQI-VI on Virtual Console?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, wasn&#39;t a DQ Swords sequel recently rumored?  Maybe it&#39;s that?</p><p>I sort of wonder how Horii plans to &#8220;seed&#8221; Wii in preparation for DQX a couple years from now?  DQVII remake?  Swords 2? Torneko 4? Monsters Battle Road?  DQI-VI on Virtual Console?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: denpanosekai</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2009/04/28/square-enix-developing-another-dragon-quest-spin-off/comment-page-1/#comment-567909</link> <dc:creator>denpanosekai</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:18:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=34365#comment-567909</guid> <description>Sooo who are you talking to?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sooo who are you talking to?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anti Smile</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2009/04/28/square-enix-developing-another-dragon-quest-spin-off/comment-page-1/#comment-567908</link> <dc:creator>Anti Smile</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:31:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=34365#comment-567908</guid> <description>stupid comment. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;you&#039;re not fan of the main dragon quest series, yet, you&#039;re a fan of the dragon quest remakes. the main dragon quest series games and the remake games are EXACTLY THE SAME! the dragon quest series hasn&#039;t changed in YEARS. it&#039;s never going to change and that&#039;s the way the japanese people like it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>stupid comment.</p><p>you&#39;re not fan of the main dragon quest series, yet, you&#39;re a fan of the dragon quest remakes. the main dragon quest series games and the remake games are EXACTLY THE SAME! the dragon quest series hasn&#39;t changed in YEARS. it&#39;s never going to change and that&#39;s the way the japanese people like it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: pressstart</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2009/04/28/square-enix-developing-another-dragon-quest-spin-off/comment-page-1/#comment-567906</link> <dc:creator>pressstart</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:20:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=34365#comment-567906</guid> <description>What about that arcade Dragon Quest? That game has some sweet eyecandy. Not sure how the gameplay is like though.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about that arcade Dragon Quest? That game has some sweet eyecandy. Not sure how the gameplay is like though.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jarrodand</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2009/04/28/square-enix-developing-another-dragon-quest-spin-off/comment-page-1/#comment-567904</link> <dc:creator>jarrodand</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:55:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=34365#comment-567904</guid> <description>LOL.  Now I&#039;m going to have Brownie Brown inspired nightmares. :(</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL.  Now I&#39;m going to have Brownie Brown inspired nightmares. :(</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jarrodand</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2009/04/28/square-enix-developing-another-dragon-quest-spin-off/comment-page-1/#comment-567905</link> <dc:creator>jarrodand</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:54:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=34365#comment-567905</guid> <description>I&#039;m surprised it didn&#039;t get a DS conversion.  Torneko 2-3 at least made it to GBA, and Chocobo Dungeon Wii got ported to DS.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m surprised it didn&#39;t get a DS conversion.  Torneko 2-3 at least made it to GBA, and Chocobo Dungeon Wii got ported to DS.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: denpanosekai</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2009/04/28/square-enix-developing-another-dragon-quest-spin-off/comment-page-1/#comment-567903</link> <dc:creator>denpanosekai</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:08:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=34365#comment-567903</guid> <description>I&#039;m still pissed off we never got the latest roguelike DQ: Young Angus&#039; Mysterious Dungeon (PS2, 2006).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m still pissed off we never got the latest roguelike DQ: Young Angus&#39; Mysterious Dungeon (PS2, 2006).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: blueblaze64</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2009/04/28/square-enix-developing-another-dragon-quest-spin-off/comment-page-1/#comment-567902</link> <dc:creator>blueblaze64</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:53:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=34365#comment-567902</guid> <description>yeah DQ spon-offs are really well designed</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah DQ spon-offs are really well designed</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mr. Mee</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2009/04/28/square-enix-developing-another-dragon-quest-spin-off/comment-page-1/#comment-567901</link> <dc:creator>Mr. Mee</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:50:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=34365#comment-567901</guid> <description>Well I&#039;m fascinated by that trademark.  I&quot;m still waiting for Dragon Quest IX though.  With my luck DQW will be an RTS but I would love it if it were a turn based strategy game.  I&#039;d probably buy it either way.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I&#39;m fascinated by that trademark.  I&#8221;m still waiting for Dragon Quest IX though.  With my luck DQW will be an RTS but I would love it if it were a turn based strategy game.  I&#39;d probably buy it either way.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jw</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2009/04/28/square-enix-developing-another-dragon-quest-spin-off/comment-page-1/#comment-567896</link> <dc:creator>jw</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:32:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=34365#comment-567896</guid> <description>I&#039;m not a super huge fan of the main DQ series but the DQ spinoffs (and remakes) are suprisingly well designed (and balanced!)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m not a super huge fan of the main DQ series but the DQ spinoffs (and remakes) are suprisingly well designed (and balanced!)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/21 queries in 0.094 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 635/639 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via storage.siliconera.com

Served from: www.siliconera.com @ 2012-02-12 01:53:00 -->
