<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: The Business of Reprints</title> <atom:link href="http://www.siliconera.com/2006/01/16/the-business-of-reprints/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2006/01/16/the-business-of-reprints/</link> <description>The secret level in the world of video game news.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 01:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Iori Branford</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2006/01/16/the-business-of-reprints/comment-page-3/#comment-413945</link> <dc:creator>Iori Branford</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:38:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=792#comment-413945</guid> <description>If the reprints are identical to the originals, technically they&#039;re just continuing the first printing.Besides, these will go out of stock too at some point. You can go back to charging an arm and a left nut then.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the reprints are identical to the originals, technically they&#8217;re just continuing the first printing.</p><p>Besides, these will go out of stock too at some point. You can go back to charging an arm and a left nut then.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Iori Branford</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2006/01/16/the-business-of-reprints/comment-page-3/#comment-647112</link> <dc:creator>Iori Branford</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:38:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=792#comment-647112</guid> <description>If the reprints are identical to the originals, technically they&#039;re just continuing the first printing.Besides, these will go out of stock too at some point. You can go back to charging an arm and a left nut then.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the reprints are identical to the originals, technically they&#8217;re just continuing the first printing.</p><p>Besides, these will go out of stock too at some point. You can go back to charging an arm and a left nut then.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Iori Branford</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2006/01/16/the-business-of-reprints/comment-page-3/#comment-647113</link> <dc:creator>Iori Branford</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:38:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=792#comment-647113</guid> <description>If the reprints are identical to the originals, technically they&#039;re just continuing the first printing.Besides, these will go out of stock too at some point. You can go back to charging an arm and a left nut then.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the reprints are identical to the originals, technically they&#8217;re just continuing the first printing.</p><p>Besides, these will go out of stock too at some point. You can go back to charging an arm and a left nut then.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rich</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2006/01/16/the-business-of-reprints/comment-page-3/#comment-349311</link> <dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:47:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=792#comment-349311</guid> <description>This happens with EVERY type of collectible at some point, although generally there is something to differentiate the re-issue.  When Uni-Five re-released the Mazinger Z and Great Mazinger Jumbos a few years back they used the original box art, but with a UNI-Five logo.  I am fine with that.  It made a rare toy available to a wider audience, and didn&#039;t diminish the original value very much.GQD selling these on Ebay without stating that it&#039;s a new pressing is shady as hell.I&#039;m all for stuff being re-printed, but not in the case where it&#039;s being mis-represented as old store stock or something.That said, you take a gamble collecting anything.  The value can go up or down, and it&#039;s not any company&#039;s responsibility to make sure your copy of Magik Defenders of Evil 2: The Eviling retains it&#039;s secondary market value.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This happens with EVERY type of collectible at some point, although generally there is something to differentiate the re-issue.  When Uni-Five re-released the Mazinger Z and Great Mazinger Jumbos a few years back they used the original box art, but with a UNI-Five logo.  I am fine with that.  It made a rare toy available to a wider audience, and didn&#8217;t diminish the original value very much.</p><p>GQD selling these on Ebay without stating that it&#8217;s a new pressing is shady as hell.</p><p>I&#8217;m all for stuff being re-printed, but not in the case where it&#8217;s being mis-represented as old store stock or something.</p><p>That said, you take a gamble collecting anything.  The value can go up or down, and it&#8217;s not any company&#8217;s responsibility to make sure your copy of Magik Defenders of Evil 2: The Eviling retains it&#8217;s secondary market value.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rich</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2006/01/16/the-business-of-reprints/comment-page-3/#comment-647110</link> <dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:47:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=792#comment-647110</guid> <description>This happens with EVERY type of collectible at some point, although generally there is something to differentiate the re-issue.  When Uni-Five re-released the Mazinger Z and Great Mazinger Jumbos a few years back they used the original box art, but with a UNI-Five logo.  I am fine with that.  It made a rare toy available to a wider audience, and didn&#039;t diminish the original value very much.GQD selling these on Ebay without stating that it&#039;s a new pressing is shady as hell.I&#039;m all for stuff being re-printed, but not in the case where it&#039;s being mis-represented as old store stock or something.That said, you take a gamble collecting anything.  The value can go up or down, and it&#039;s not any company&#039;s responsibility to make sure your copy of Magik Defenders of Evil 2: The Eviling retains it&#039;s secondary market value.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This happens with EVERY type of collectible at some point, although generally there is something to differentiate the re-issue.  When Uni-Five re-released the Mazinger Z and Great Mazinger Jumbos a few years back they used the original box art, but with a UNI-Five logo.  I am fine with that.  It made a rare toy available to a wider audience, and didn&#8217;t diminish the original value very much.</p><p>GQD selling these on Ebay without stating that it&#8217;s a new pressing is shady as hell.</p><p>I&#8217;m all for stuff being re-printed, but not in the case where it&#8217;s being mis-represented as old store stock or something.</p><p>That said, you take a gamble collecting anything.  The value can go up or down, and it&#8217;s not any company&#8217;s responsibility to make sure your copy of Magik Defenders of Evil 2: The Eviling retains it&#8217;s secondary market value.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rich</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2006/01/16/the-business-of-reprints/comment-page-3/#comment-647111</link> <dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:47:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=792#comment-647111</guid> <description>This happens with EVERY type of collectible at some point, although generally there is something to differentiate the re-issue.  When Uni-Five re-released the Mazinger Z and Great Mazinger Jumbos a few years back they used the original box art, but with a UNI-Five logo.  I am fine with that.  It made a rare toy available to a wider audience, and didn&#039;t diminish the original value very much.GQD selling these on Ebay without stating that it&#039;s a new pressing is shady as hell.I&#039;m all for stuff being re-printed, but not in the case where it&#039;s being mis-represented as old store stock or something.That said, you take a gamble collecting anything.  The value can go up or down, and it&#039;s not any company&#039;s responsibility to make sure your copy of Magik Defenders of Evil 2: The Eviling retains it&#039;s secondary market value.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This happens with EVERY type of collectible at some point, although generally there is something to differentiate the re-issue.  When Uni-Five re-released the Mazinger Z and Great Mazinger Jumbos a few years back they used the original box art, but with a UNI-Five logo.  I am fine with that.  It made a rare toy available to a wider audience, and didn&#8217;t diminish the original value very much.</p><p>GQD selling these on Ebay without stating that it&#8217;s a new pressing is shady as hell.</p><p>I&#8217;m all for stuff being re-printed, but not in the case where it&#8217;s being mis-represented as old store stock or something.</p><p>That said, you take a gamble collecting anything.  The value can go up or down, and it&#8217;s not any company&#8217;s responsibility to make sure your copy of Magik Defenders of Evil 2: The Eviling retains it&#8217;s secondary market value.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jobb</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2006/01/16/the-business-of-reprints/comment-page-3/#comment-55136</link> <dc:creator>Jobb</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 03:57:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=792#comment-55136</guid> <description>&quot;or someone who just wants to play games, but these people are not real game players.&quot;LOL... yeah the real game players are the ones who put their sealed games in a locked box and stare at them. Right</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;or someone who just wants to play games, but these people are not real game players.&#8221;</p><p>LOL&#8230; yeah the real game players are the ones who put their sealed games in a locked box and stare at them. Right</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jobb</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2006/01/16/the-business-of-reprints/comment-page-3/#comment-647108</link> <dc:creator>Jobb</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 03:57:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=792#comment-647108</guid> <description>&quot;or someone who just wants to play games, but these people are not real game players.&quot;LOL... yeah the real game players are the ones who put their sealed games in a locked box and stare at them. Right</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;or someone who just wants to play games, but these people are not real game players.&#8221;</p><p>LOL&#8230; yeah the real game players are the ones who put their sealed games in a locked box and stare at them. Right</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jobb</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2006/01/16/the-business-of-reprints/comment-page-3/#comment-647109</link> <dc:creator>Jobb</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 03:57:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=792#comment-647109</guid> <description>&quot;or someone who just wants to play games, but these people are not real game players.&quot;LOL... yeah the real game players are the ones who put their sealed games in a locked box and stare at them. Right</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;or someone who just wants to play games, but these people are not real game players.&#8221;</p><p>LOL&#8230; yeah the real game players are the ones who put their sealed games in a locked box and stare at them. Right</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Silent_Edge</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2006/01/16/the-business-of-reprints/comment-page-3/#comment-46369</link> <dc:creator>Silent_Edge</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 21:16:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=792#comment-46369</guid> <description>Well...  there does appear to be some sort of a difference between the Disgaea Hour of Darkness cover art.  One of them has Larharl on the bottom left side corner of the cover, and another has a succubus.  Which of these is the original, I don&#039;t know, but a little bit some clarification would help a lot.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230;  there does appear to be some sort of a difference between the Disgaea Hour of Darkness cover art.  One of them has Larharl on the bottom left side corner of the cover, and another has a succubus.  Which of these is the original, I don&#8217;t know, but a little bit some clarification would help a lot.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Silent_Edge</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2006/01/16/the-business-of-reprints/comment-page-3/#comment-647106</link> <dc:creator>Silent_Edge</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 21:16:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=792#comment-647106</guid> <description>Well...  there does appear to be some sort of a difference between the Disgaea Hour of Darkness cover art.  One of them has Larharl on the bottom left side corner of the cover, and another has a succubus.  Which of these is the original, I don&#039;t know, but a little bit some clarification would help a lot.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230;  there does appear to be some sort of a difference between the Disgaea Hour of Darkness cover art.  One of them has Larharl on the bottom left side corner of the cover, and another has a succubus.  Which of these is the original, I don&#8217;t know, but a little bit some clarification would help a lot.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Silent_Edge</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2006/01/16/the-business-of-reprints/comment-page-3/#comment-647107</link> <dc:creator>Silent_Edge</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 21:16:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=792#comment-647107</guid> <description>Well...  there does appear to be some sort of a difference between the Disgaea Hour of Darkness cover art.  One of them has Larharl on the bottom left side corner of the cover, and another has a succubus.  Which of these is the original, I don&#039;t know, but a little bit some clarification would help a lot.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230;  there does appear to be some sort of a difference between the Disgaea Hour of Darkness cover art.  One of them has Larharl on the bottom left side corner of the cover, and another has a succubus.  Which of these is the original, I don&#8217;t know, but a little bit some clarification would help a lot.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Carmen</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2006/01/16/the-business-of-reprints/comment-page-3/#comment-16711</link> <dc:creator>Carmen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 23:37:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=792#comment-16711</guid> <description>Ok, can we make a distinction?  Is GQD actually reprinting these, or is it the original American publisher reprinting that GQD is negotitating with?  Obviously if GQD was making the games themselves, that would be bollocks, but if the original publisher is making it, even with GQD&#039;s lobbying, I don&#039;t see the issue as long as the quality of the whole set is as good or better then the original...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, can we make a distinction?  Is GQD actually reprinting these, or is it the original American publisher reprinting that GQD is negotitating with?  Obviously if GQD was making the games themselves, that would be bollocks, but if the original publisher is making it, even with GQD&#8217;s lobbying, I don&#8217;t see the issue as long as the quality of the whole set is as good or better then the original&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Carmen</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2006/01/16/the-business-of-reprints/comment-page-3/#comment-647104</link> <dc:creator>Carmen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 23:37:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=792#comment-647104</guid> <description>Ok, can we make a distinction?  Is GQD actually reprinting these, or is it the original American publisher reprinting that GQD is negotitating with?  Obviously if GQD was making the games themselves, that would be bollocks, but if the original publisher is making it, even with GQD&#039;s lobbying, I don&#039;t see the issue as long as the quality of the whole set is as good or better then the original...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, can we make a distinction?  Is GQD actually reprinting these, or is it the original American publisher reprinting that GQD is negotitating with?  Obviously if GQD was making the games themselves, that would be bollocks, but if the original publisher is making it, even with GQD&#8217;s lobbying, I don&#8217;t see the issue as long as the quality of the whole set is as good or better then the original&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Carmen</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2006/01/16/the-business-of-reprints/comment-page-3/#comment-647105</link> <dc:creator>Carmen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 23:37:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=792#comment-647105</guid> <description>Ok, can we make a distinction?  Is GQD actually reprinting these, or is it the original American publisher reprinting that GQD is negotitating with?  Obviously if GQD was making the games themselves, that would be bollocks, but if the original publisher is making it, even with GQD&#039;s lobbying, I don&#039;t see the issue as long as the quality of the whole set is as good or better then the original...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, can we make a distinction?  Is GQD actually reprinting these, or is it the original American publisher reprinting that GQD is negotitating with?  Obviously if GQD was making the games themselves, that would be bollocks, but if the original publisher is making it, even with GQD&#8217;s lobbying, I don&#8217;t see the issue as long as the quality of the whole set is as good or better then the original&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 6/21 queries in 0.134 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 635/639 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via storage.siliconera.com

Served from: www.siliconera.com @ 2012-02-11 12:59:40 -->
