<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Playstation 3 virtual console games priced</title> <atom:link href="http://www.siliconera.com/2006/11/21/playstation-3-virtual-console-games-priced/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2006/11/21/playstation-3-virtual-console-games-priced/</link> <description>The secret level in the world of video game news.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 01:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: l0ne</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2006/11/21/playstation-3-virtual-console-games-priced/comment-page-1/#comment-27884</link> <dc:creator>l0ne</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 08:50:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/index.php/2006/11/21/playstation-3-virtual-console-games-priced/#comment-27884</guid> <description>snake: Moot point. Multi-disc PS1 games didn&#039;t cost more than monodisc PS1 games, and the same is likely to hold here.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>snake: Moot point. Multi-disc PS1 games didn&#8217;t cost more than monodisc PS1 games, and the same is likely to hold here.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: l0ne</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2006/11/21/playstation-3-virtual-console-games-priced/comment-page-1/#comment-662599</link> <dc:creator>l0ne</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 08:50:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/index.php/2006/11/21/playstation-3-virtual-console-games-priced/#comment-662599</guid> <description>snake: Moot point. Multi-disc PS1 games didn&#039;t cost more than monodisc PS1 games, and the same is likely to hold here.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>snake: Moot point. Multi-disc PS1 games didn&#8217;t cost more than monodisc PS1 games, and the same is likely to hold here.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dansk</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2006/11/21/playstation-3-virtual-console-games-priced/comment-page-1/#comment-27727</link> <dc:creator>Dansk</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:14:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/index.php/2006/11/21/playstation-3-virtual-console-games-priced/#comment-27727</guid> <description>Jumping Flash is pretty good. Specially good deal since you can&#039;t play it on a PS2.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jumping Flash is pretty good. Specially good deal since you can&#8217;t play it on a PS2.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dansk</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2006/11/21/playstation-3-virtual-console-games-priced/comment-page-1/#comment-662598</link> <dc:creator>Dansk</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:14:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/index.php/2006/11/21/playstation-3-virtual-console-games-priced/#comment-662598</guid> <description>Jumping Flash is pretty good. Specially good deal since you can&#039;t play it on a PS2.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jumping Flash is pretty good. Specially good deal since you can&#8217;t play it on a PS2.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: snake</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2006/11/21/playstation-3-virtual-console-games-priced/comment-page-1/#comment-27640</link> <dc:creator>snake</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:56:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/index.php/2006/11/21/playstation-3-virtual-console-games-priced/#comment-27640</guid> <description>$4.50 isnt very cheap considering the games in that list are only 1 disk games, once they start bringing out multi disk games for download it will probably end up as 4.50 per disk. Is it really worth $18 to download an emulated copy of FF9? i think it should be more like $2.50 per disk.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$4.50 isnt very cheap considering the games in that list are only 1 disk games, once they start bringing out multi disk games for download it will probably end up as 4.50 per disk.<br /> Is it really worth $18 to download an emulated copy of FF9? i think it should be more like $2.50 per disk.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: snake</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2006/11/21/playstation-3-virtual-console-games-priced/comment-page-1/#comment-662597</link> <dc:creator>snake</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:56:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/index.php/2006/11/21/playstation-3-virtual-console-games-priced/#comment-662597</guid> <description>$4.50 isnt very cheap considering the games in that list are only 1 disk games, once they start bringing out multi disk games for download it will probably end up as 4.50 per disk. Is it really worth $18 to download an emulated copy of FF9? i think it should be more like $2.50 per disk.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$4.50 isnt very cheap considering the games in that list are only 1 disk games, once they start bringing out multi disk games for download it will probably end up as 4.50 per disk.<br /> Is it really worth $18 to download an emulated copy of FF9? i think it should be more like $2.50 per disk.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/12 queries in 0.090 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 455/459 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via storage.siliconera.com

Served from: www.siliconera.com @ 2012-02-11 20:49:22 -->
