<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ouch! Double Dragon fails?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.siliconera.com/2007/05/12/ouch-double-dragon-fails/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.siliconera.com/2007/05/12/ouch-double-dragon-fails/</link>
	<description>The secret level in the world of video game news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:38:09 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: markgreyam</title>
		<link>http://www.siliconera.com/2007/05/12/ouch-double-dragon-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-80562</link>
		<dc:creator>markgreyam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 03:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/index.php/2007/05/12/ouch-double-dragon-fails/#comment-80562</guid>
		<description>Dan, it does play like Double Dragon. Too well, in fact. It&#039;s bullshit cheap, it&#039;s slow as all hell when more than three people are on the screen, and the stupid jumping kick never works when I want it to. It&#039;s exactly like it was in the arcades, except there is something less satisfying about getting free continues; it just doesn&#039;t feel like a challenge when you aren&#039;t putting your own hard earned 20c coins in. And I could have lived without an accurate representation of the slowdown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, it does play like Double Dragon. Too well, in fact. It&#8217;s bullshit cheap, it&#8217;s slow as all hell when more than three people are on the screen, and the stupid jumping kick never works when I want it to. It&#8217;s exactly like it was in the arcades, except there is something less satisfying about getting free continues; it just doesn&#8217;t feel like a challenge when you aren&#8217;t putting your own hard earned 20c coins in. And I could have lived without an accurate representation of the slowdown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EvilAkito</title>
		<link>http://www.siliconera.com/2007/05/12/ouch-double-dragon-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-80332</link>
		<dc:creator>EvilAkito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 05:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/index.php/2007/05/12/ouch-double-dragon-fails/#comment-80332</guid>
		<description>In all honestly, I think Double Dragon suffers from overrated-classic-syndrome. It really doesn&#039;t play that well by beat &#039;em up standards, but it&#039;s a classic, so we remember it being much better than it actually is. The only DD game I ever really cared for was the NES version of Double Dragon 2, which wasn&#039;t perfect, but it had a pretty unique play-style that deviated from the typical mindless button-mashing that plagues the genre.

Of course, I seem to recall the GBA remake of Double Dragon being surprisingly good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In all honestly, I think Double Dragon suffers from overrated-classic-syndrome. It really doesn&#8217;t play that well by beat &#8216;em up standards, but it&#8217;s a classic, so we remember it being much better than it actually is. The only DD game I ever really cared for was the NES version of Double Dragon 2, which wasn&#8217;t perfect, but it had a pretty unique play-style that deviated from the typical mindless button-mashing that plagues the genre.</p>
<p>Of course, I seem to recall the GBA remake of Double Dragon being surprisingly good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M'Buma</title>
		<link>http://www.siliconera.com/2007/05/12/ouch-double-dragon-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-80307</link>
		<dc:creator>M'Buma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 03:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/index.php/2007/05/12/ouch-double-dragon-fails/#comment-80307</guid>
		<description>Oops!

edit from the previous post:
The original game was alos slowing down when too many characters were on screen...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops!</p>
<p>edit from the previous post:<br />
The original game was alos slowing down when too many characters were on screen&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M'Buma</title>
		<link>http://www.siliconera.com/2007/05/12/ouch-double-dragon-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-80304</link>
		<dc:creator>M'Buma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 02:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/index.php/2007/05/12/ouch-double-dragon-fails/#comment-80304</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s so bad about it? You don&#039;t explain yourself... I thought that these games were perfect conversions from the arcade...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s so bad about it? You don&#8217;t explain yourself&#8230; I thought that these games were perfect conversions from the arcade&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Visionnerz</title>
		<link>http://www.siliconera.com/2007/05/12/ouch-double-dragon-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-80245</link>
		<dc:creator>Visionnerz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 22:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/index.php/2007/05/12/ouch-double-dragon-fails/#comment-80245</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d much rather play a Kunio-kun game anyhow...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d much rather play a Kunio-kun game anyhow&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Zuccarelli</title>
		<link>http://www.siliconera.com/2007/05/12/ouch-double-dragon-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-80223</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Zuccarelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 21:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/index.php/2007/05/12/ouch-double-dragon-fails/#comment-80223</guid>
		<description>&quot;That’s because people nowadays want these classic games to play like Gears of War or something. &quot;

This is actually incorrect John.  I play tons of retro/classic games and I don&#039;t expect a game like Double Dragon to play like it&#039;s Gears of War... I want Double Dragon to play like Double Dragon. 

It doesn&#039;t. 

Now if you&#039;ll excuse me I need to get back to Rampart, a true example of a classic title on a new system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;That’s because people nowadays want these classic games to play like Gears of War or something. &#8221;</p>
<p>This is actually incorrect John.  I play tons of retro/classic games and I don&#8217;t expect a game like Double Dragon to play like it&#8217;s Gears of War&#8230; I want Double Dragon to play like Double Dragon. </p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t. </p>
<p>Now if you&#8217;ll excuse me I need to get back to Rampart, a true example of a classic title on a new system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.siliconera.com/2007/05/12/ouch-double-dragon-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-80204</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 19:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/index.php/2007/05/12/ouch-double-dragon-fails/#comment-80204</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s because people nowadays want these classic games to play like Gears of War or something. We should be grateful to even have Double Dragon on XBLA, I know I am.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s because people nowadays want these classic games to play like Gears of War or something. We should be grateful to even have Double Dragon on XBLA, I know I am.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aoshi00</title>
		<link>http://www.siliconera.com/2007/05/12/ouch-double-dragon-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-80171</link>
		<dc:creator>Aoshi00</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 17:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/index.php/2007/05/12/ouch-double-dragon-fails/#comment-80171</guid>
		<description>The XBLA version looks quite ugly w/ the &quot;revamped&quot; graphics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The XBLA version looks quite ugly w/ the &#8220;revamped&#8221; graphics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
