<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Atari explains how their Atari Classics “Evolved”</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.siliconera.com/2007/11/13/atari-explains-how-their-atari-classics-%e2%80%9cevolved%e2%80%9d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.siliconera.com/2007/11/13/atari-explains-how-their-atari-classics-%e2%80%9cevolved%e2%80%9d/</link>
	<description>Video Game news for insiders.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: wishiwas</title>
		<link>http://www.siliconera.com/2007/11/13/atari-explains-how-their-atari-classics-%e2%80%9cevolved%e2%80%9d/#comment-288415</link>
		<dc:creator>wishiwas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 00:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/2007/11/13/atari-explains-how-their-atari-classics-%e2%80%9cevolved%e2%80%9d/#comment-288415</guid>
		<description>Ron, Galaga is a Namco product.
Although a great game, its not made by Atari.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron, Galaga is a Namco product.<br />
Although a great game, its not made by Atari.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.siliconera.com/2007/11/13/atari-explains-how-their-atari-classics-%e2%80%9cevolved%e2%80%9d/#comment-237454</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/2007/11/13/atari-explains-how-their-atari-classics-%e2%80%9cevolved%e2%80%9d/#comment-237454</guid>
		<description>Galaga, I hope?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Galaga, I hope?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JeremyR</title>
		<link>http://www.siliconera.com/2007/11/13/atari-explains-how-their-atari-classics-%e2%80%9cevolved%e2%80%9d/#comment-237431</link>
		<dc:creator>JeremyR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 21:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/2007/11/13/atari-explains-how-their-atari-classics-%e2%80%9cevolved%e2%80%9d/#comment-237431</guid>
		<description>I wouldn't think any of the games in this are licensed properties (like ET is), which is a shame, since many of those (not ET, obviously) were the best 2600 games.  Phoenix, Vanguard, Space Invaders, Defender, etc. This will only have Atari's own arcade games, like Warlords, Centipede, Asteroids, Missile Command, etc.

Lunar Lander should be okay, but those other two choices seem odd for remakes, because pong style games really require a paddle or dial-style controller to be playable. With a d-pad or analog stick, they're almost impossible, too touchy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t think any of the games in this are licensed properties (like ET is), which is a shame, since many of those (not ET, obviously) were the best 2600 games.  Phoenix, Vanguard, Space Invaders, Defender, etc. This will only have Atari&#8217;s own arcade games, like Warlords, Centipede, Asteroids, Missile Command, etc.</p>
<p>Lunar Lander should be okay, but those other two choices seem odd for remakes, because pong style games really require a paddle or dial-style controller to be playable. With a d-pad or analog stick, they&#8217;re almost impossible, too touchy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
