<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Contra III NES vs. Contra III SNES</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.siliconera.com/2008/04/02/contra-iii-nes-vs-contra-iii-snes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.siliconera.com/2008/04/02/contra-iii-nes-vs-contra-iii-snes/</link>
	<description>Video Game news for insiders.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 05:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: EvilAkito</title>
		<link>http://www.siliconera.com/2008/04/02/contra-iii-nes-vs-contra-iii-snes/#comment-408419</link>
		<dc:creator>EvilAkito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 02:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/2008/04/02/contra-iii-nes-vs-contra-iii-snes/#comment-408419</guid>
		<description>Oww, my poor innocent ears!

Other than the "music," that actually looks fairly well made. It would actually be kind of neat to have a job making unlicensed games for obsolete hardware.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oww, my poor innocent ears!</p>
<p>Other than the &#8220;music,&#8221; that actually looks fairly well made. It would actually be kind of neat to have a job making unlicensed games for obsolete hardware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.siliconera.com/2008/04/02/contra-iii-nes-vs-contra-iii-snes/#comment-408416</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 02:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/2008/04/02/contra-iii-nes-vs-contra-iii-snes/#comment-408416</guid>
		<description>Well, I know that Famitsu gave Contra 4 a 28/40 (7, 7, 7, 7,). Beyond that, I'm wondering myself what they thought about it specifically.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I know that Famitsu gave Contra 4 a 28/40 (7, 7, 7, 7,). Beyond that, I&#8217;m wondering myself what they thought about it specifically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeffx</title>
		<link>http://www.siliconera.com/2008/04/02/contra-iii-nes-vs-contra-iii-snes/#comment-408354</link>
		<dc:creator>jeffx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 20:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/2008/04/02/contra-iii-nes-vs-contra-iii-snes/#comment-408354</guid>
		<description>love these articles, keep pumping them out.

That said, contra IV was one of my favorite games of 2007. I know it came out recently in Japan, is there any way you could investigate into how well it fared over there? Considering this is a classic Japanese series remade by (capable) American hands, I'd like to know what real hardcore Contra players thought of it. Similarly, I wonder how Silent Hill Origins was received.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>love these articles, keep pumping them out.</p>
<p>That said, contra IV was one of my favorite games of 2007. I know it came out recently in Japan, is there any way you could investigate into how well it fared over there? Considering this is a classic Japanese series remade by (capable) American hands, I&#8217;d like to know what real hardcore Contra players thought of it. Similarly, I wonder how Silent Hill Origins was received.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TacoBeaver</title>
		<link>http://www.siliconera.com/2008/04/02/contra-iii-nes-vs-contra-iii-snes/#comment-408350</link>
		<dc:creator>TacoBeaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 20:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/2008/04/02/contra-iii-nes-vs-contra-iii-snes/#comment-408350</guid>
		<description>is it me or they look exactly the same o.O</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is it me or they look exactly the same o.O</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
