<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Tatsunoko VS Capcom, now with clearer screens</title> <atom:link href="http://www.siliconera.com/2008/05/22/tatsunoko-vs-capcom-now-with-clearer-screens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2008/05/22/tatsunoko-vs-capcom-now-with-clearer-screens/</link> <description>The secret level in the world of video game news.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 01:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Nightcap</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2008/05/22/tatsunoko-vs-capcom-now-with-clearer-screens/comment-page-1/#comment-451156</link> <dc:creator>Nightcap</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 03:43:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/2008/05/22/tatsunoko-vs-capcom-now-with-clearer-screens/#comment-451156</guid> <description>It looks nice in those pics, but it kind of gives me the impression that there will be like 3 frames of animation which would suck. As long as it has smooth animation then woot!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks nice in those pics, but it kind of gives me the impression that there will be like 3 frames of animation which would suck. As long as it has smooth animation then woot!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nightcap</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2008/05/22/tatsunoko-vs-capcom-now-with-clearer-screens/comment-page-1/#comment-689353</link> <dc:creator>Nightcap</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 03:43:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/2008/05/22/tatsunoko-vs-capcom-now-with-clearer-screens/#comment-689353</guid> <description>It looks nice in those pics, but it kind of gives me the impression that there will be like 3 frames of animation which would suck. As long as it has smooth animation then woot!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks nice in those pics, but it kind of gives me the impression that there will be like 3 frames of animation which would suck. As long as it has smooth animation then woot!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nightcap</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2008/05/22/tatsunoko-vs-capcom-now-with-clearer-screens/comment-page-1/#comment-689354</link> <dc:creator>Nightcap</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 03:43:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/2008/05/22/tatsunoko-vs-capcom-now-with-clearer-screens/#comment-689354</guid> <description>It looks nice in those pics, but it kind of gives me the impression that there will be like 3 frames of animation which would suck. As long as it has smooth animation then woot!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks nice in those pics, but it kind of gives me the impression that there will be like 3 frames of animation which would suck. As long as it has smooth animation then woot!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nightcap</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2008/05/22/tatsunoko-vs-capcom-now-with-clearer-screens/comment-page-1/#comment-689355</link> <dc:creator>Nightcap</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 03:43:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/2008/05/22/tatsunoko-vs-capcom-now-with-clearer-screens/#comment-689355</guid> <description>It looks nice in those pics, but it kind of gives me the impression that there will be like 3 frames of animation which would suck. As long as it has smooth animation then woot!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks nice in those pics, but it kind of gives me the impression that there will be like 3 frames of animation which would suck. As long as it has smooth animation then woot!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: R</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2008/05/22/tatsunoko-vs-capcom-now-with-clearer-screens/comment-page-1/#comment-449269</link> <dc:creator>R</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 12:41:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/2008/05/22/tatsunoko-vs-capcom-now-with-clearer-screens/#comment-449269</guid> <description>I&#039;m also with the people who say this looks better than SFIV. The character models might still be wonky close up, but I think the higher-contrast cel-shading improves things from far away as well.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m also with the people who say this looks better than SFIV. The character models might still be wonky close up, but I think the higher-contrast cel-shading improves things from far away as well.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: honorless</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2008/05/22/tatsunoko-vs-capcom-now-with-clearer-screens/comment-page-1/#comment-689350</link> <dc:creator>honorless</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 12:41:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/2008/05/22/tatsunoko-vs-capcom-now-with-clearer-screens/#comment-689350</guid> <description>I&#039;m also with the people who say this looks better than SFIV. The character models might still be wonky close up, but I think the higher-contrast cel-shading improves things from far away as well.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m also with the people who say this looks better than SFIV. The character models might still be wonky close up, but I think the higher-contrast cel-shading improves things from far away as well.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: honorless</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2008/05/22/tatsunoko-vs-capcom-now-with-clearer-screens/comment-page-1/#comment-689351</link> <dc:creator>honorless</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 12:41:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/2008/05/22/tatsunoko-vs-capcom-now-with-clearer-screens/#comment-689351</guid> <description>I&#039;m also with the people who say this looks better than SFIV. The character models might still be wonky close up, but I think the higher-contrast cel-shading improves things from far away as well.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m also with the people who say this looks better than SFIV. The character models might still be wonky close up, but I think the higher-contrast cel-shading improves things from far away as well.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: honorless</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2008/05/22/tatsunoko-vs-capcom-now-with-clearer-screens/comment-page-1/#comment-689352</link> <dc:creator>honorless</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 12:41:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/2008/05/22/tatsunoko-vs-capcom-now-with-clearer-screens/#comment-689352</guid> <description>I&#039;m also with the people who say this looks better than SFIV. The character models might still be wonky close up, but I think the higher-contrast cel-shading improves things from far away as well.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m also with the people who say this looks better than SFIV. The character models might still be wonky close up, but I think the higher-contrast cel-shading improves things from far away as well.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: seiya19</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2008/05/22/tatsunoko-vs-capcom-now-with-clearer-screens/comment-page-1/#comment-448500</link> <dc:creator>seiya19</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 00:38:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/2008/05/22/tatsunoko-vs-capcom-now-with-clearer-screens/#comment-448500</guid> <description>Looks good. It reminds me of King of Fighters XII with that cel-shading style...although I prefer BlazBlueÂ´s style over it (high resolution sprites). And IÂ´m not expecting a US release either...just a console port to import.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks good. It reminds me of King of Fighters XII with that cel-shading style&#8230;although I prefer BlazBlueÂ´s style over it (high resolution sprites). And IÂ´m not expecting a US release either&#8230;just a console port to import.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: seiya19</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2008/05/22/tatsunoko-vs-capcom-now-with-clearer-screens/comment-page-1/#comment-689371</link> <dc:creator>seiya19</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 00:38:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/2008/05/22/tatsunoko-vs-capcom-now-with-clearer-screens/#comment-689371</guid> <description>Looks good. It reminds me of King of Fighters XII with that cel-shading style...although I prefer BlazBlueÂ´s style over it (high resolution sprites). And IÂ´m not expecting a US release either...just a console port to import.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks good. It reminds me of King of Fighters XII with that cel-shading style&#8230;although I prefer BlazBlueÂ´s style over it (high resolution sprites). And IÂ´m not expecting a US release either&#8230;just a console port to import.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: seiya19</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2008/05/22/tatsunoko-vs-capcom-now-with-clearer-screens/comment-page-1/#comment-689372</link> <dc:creator>seiya19</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 00:38:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/2008/05/22/tatsunoko-vs-capcom-now-with-clearer-screens/#comment-689372</guid> <description>Looks good. It reminds me of King of Fighters XII with that cel-shading style...although I prefer BlazBlueÂ´s style over it (high resolution sprites). And IÂ´m not expecting a US release either...just a console port to import.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks good. It reminds me of King of Fighters XII with that cel-shading style&#8230;although I prefer BlazBlueÂ´s style over it (high resolution sprites). And IÂ´m not expecting a US release either&#8230;just a console port to import.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: thaKingRocka</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2008/05/22/tatsunoko-vs-capcom-now-with-clearer-screens/comment-page-1/#comment-448495</link> <dc:creator>thaKingRocka</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 00:32:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/2008/05/22/tatsunoko-vs-capcom-now-with-clearer-screens/#comment-448495</guid> <description>i agree about this looking better than sf4.  my question remains though: is this hi-def?  i don&#039;t think it is.  if it is and this is released as a ps3 title, then the whole situation will be about ten times better.  if this is HD, then i think this is what sf4 should have been.  it looks really nice and clean, and it&#039;s as true to the design sketches as anything i&#039;ve ever seen.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree about this looking better than sf4.  my question remains though: is this hi-def?  i don&#8217;t think it is.  if it is and this is released as a ps3 title, then the whole situation will be about ten times better.  if this is HD, then i think this is what sf4 should have been.  it looks really nice and clean, and it&#8217;s as true to the design sketches as anything i&#8217;ve ever seen.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: thaKingRocka</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2008/05/22/tatsunoko-vs-capcom-now-with-clearer-screens/comment-page-1/#comment-689369</link> <dc:creator>thaKingRocka</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 00:32:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/2008/05/22/tatsunoko-vs-capcom-now-with-clearer-screens/#comment-689369</guid> <description>i agree about this looking better than sf4.  my question remains though: is this hi-def?  i don&#039;t think it is.  if it is and this is released as a ps3 title, then the whole situation will be about ten times better.  if this is HD, then i think this is what sf4 should have been.  it looks really nice and clean, and it&#039;s as true to the design sketches as anything i&#039;ve ever seen.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree about this looking better than sf4.  my question remains though: is this hi-def?  i don&#8217;t think it is.  if it is and this is released as a ps3 title, then the whole situation will be about ten times better.  if this is HD, then i think this is what sf4 should have been.  it looks really nice and clean, and it&#8217;s as true to the design sketches as anything i&#8217;ve ever seen.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: thaKingRocka</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2008/05/22/tatsunoko-vs-capcom-now-with-clearer-screens/comment-page-1/#comment-689370</link> <dc:creator>thaKingRocka</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 00:32:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/2008/05/22/tatsunoko-vs-capcom-now-with-clearer-screens/#comment-689370</guid> <description>i agree about this looking better than sf4.  my question remains though: is this hi-def?  i don&#039;t think it is.  if it is and this is released as a ps3 title, then the whole situation will be about ten times better.  if this is HD, then i think this is what sf4 should have been.  it looks really nice and clean, and it&#039;s as true to the design sketches as anything i&#039;ve ever seen.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree about this looking better than sf4.  my question remains though: is this hi-def?  i don&#8217;t think it is.  if it is and this is released as a ps3 title, then the whole situation will be about ten times better.  if this is HD, then i think this is what sf4 should have been.  it looks really nice and clean, and it&#8217;s as true to the design sketches as anything i&#8217;ve ever seen.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Aoshi00</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2008/05/22/tatsunoko-vs-capcom-now-with-clearer-screens/comment-page-1/#comment-448491</link> <dc:creator>Aoshi00</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 00:24:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/2008/05/22/tatsunoko-vs-capcom-now-with-clearer-screens/#comment-448491</guid> <description>It&#039;s a little ironic, the art here actually looks way better than SF IV, at least Ryu doesn&#039;t look like he&#039;s possessed or Chun Li on steroid.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a little ironic, the art here actually looks way better than SF IV, at least Ryu doesn&#8217;t look like he&#8217;s possessed or Chun Li on steroid.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 7/21 queries in 0.109 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 635/639 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via storage.siliconera.com

Served from: www.siliconera.com @ 2012-02-11 20:55:00 -->
