<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Siliconera Speaks Up: Square Enix Remakes</title> <atom:link href="http://www.siliconera.com/2008/11/30/siliconera-speaks-up-square-enix-remakes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2008/11/30/siliconera-speaks-up-square-enix-remakes/</link> <description>The secret level in the world of video game news.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 01:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Louise</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2008/11/30/siliconera-speaks-up-square-enix-remakes/comment-page-2/#comment-559940</link> <dc:creator>Louise</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 06:11:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=22991#comment-559940</guid> <description>@Aoshii00, I feel the same way with owning something tangible.  I know it&#039;s better for my cluttered house to not HAVE so much physical stuff and game boxes take up a decent amount of space. But at the same time, buying something ethereal like a VC game never seems real.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Aoshii00, I feel the same way with owning something tangible.  I know it&#8217;s better for my cluttered house to not HAVE so much physical stuff and game boxes take up a decent amount of space. But at the same time, buying something ethereal like a VC game never seems real.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Louise</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2008/11/30/siliconera-speaks-up-square-enix-remakes/comment-page-2/#comment-696879</link> <dc:creator>Louise</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 06:11:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=22991#comment-696879</guid> <description>@Aoshii00, I feel the same way with owning something tangible.  I know it&#039;s better for my cluttered house to not HAVE so much physical stuff and game boxes take up a decent amount of space. But at the same time, buying something ethereal like a VC game never seems real.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Aoshii00, I feel the same way with owning something tangible.  I know it&#8217;s better for my cluttered house to not HAVE so much physical stuff and game boxes take up a decent amount of space. But at the same time, buying something ethereal like a VC game never seems real.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Aoshi00</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2008/11/30/siliconera-speaks-up-square-enix-remakes/comment-page-2/#comment-559939</link> <dc:creator>Aoshi00</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 05:34:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=22991#comment-559939</guid> <description>One last thing, if given the option, I would always prefer a tangible boxed hard copy instead to digital d/l even if it means paying a little more.  I paid $30 net for this, for the game proper, soundtrack, and poster as part of the pre-order, to me it&#039;s totally worth it as a collector.  The only draw back is I can&#039;t play this on my 46&quot; TV.Funny thing is I keep thinking SF II HD Remix is too expensive at $15 even w/ redrawn graphics and new gameplay, perhaps it&#039;s because I can&#039;t fully enjoy it w/o the arcade stick..posted too many comments on this :(..</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One last thing, if given the option, I would always prefer a tangible boxed hard copy instead to digital d/l even if it means paying a little more.  I paid $30 net for this, for the game proper, soundtrack, and poster as part of the pre-order, to me it&#8217;s totally worth it as a collector.  The only draw back is I can&#8217;t play this on my 46&#8243; TV.</p><p>Funny thing is I keep thinking SF II HD Remix is too expensive at $15 even w/ redrawn graphics and new gameplay, perhaps it&#8217;s because I can&#8217;t fully enjoy it w/o the arcade stick..</p><p>posted too many comments on this :(..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Aoshi00</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2008/11/30/siliconera-speaks-up-square-enix-remakes/comment-page-2/#comment-696880</link> <dc:creator>Aoshi00</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 05:34:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=22991#comment-696880</guid> <description>One last thing, if given the option, I would always prefer a tangible boxed hard copy instead to digital d/l even if it means paying a little more.  I paid $30 net for this, for the game proper, soundtrack, and poster as part of the pre-order, to me it&#039;s totally worth it as a collector.  The only draw back is I can&#039;t play this on my 46&quot; TV.Funny thing is I keep thinking SF II HD Remix is too expensive at $15 even w/ redrawn graphics and new gameplay, perhaps it&#039;s because I can&#039;t fully enjoy it w/o the arcade stick..posted too many comments on this :(..</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One last thing, if given the option, I would always prefer a tangible boxed hard copy instead to digital d/l even if it means paying a little more.  I paid $30 net for this, for the game proper, soundtrack, and poster as part of the pre-order, to me it&#8217;s totally worth it as a collector.  The only draw back is I can&#8217;t play this on my 46&#8243; TV.</p><p>Funny thing is I keep thinking SF II HD Remix is too expensive at $15 even w/ redrawn graphics and new gameplay, perhaps it&#8217;s because I can&#8217;t fully enjoy it w/o the arcade stick..</p><p>posted too many comments on this :(..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Aoshi00</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2008/11/30/siliconera-speaks-up-square-enix-remakes/comment-page-2/#comment-559938</link> <dc:creator>Aoshi00</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 05:05:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=22991#comment-559938</guid> <description>Putting it in perspectives, FF 4, 5, &amp; 6 ports on GBA did have a $29.99 MRSP, $40 might not seem that outrageous for CT DS w/ even more extras packed in, on top of the new &amp; more polished translation.All of us are price conscious especially considering the no. of new games out there.  If you don&#039;t mind waiting for 6 months to a year price is bound to drop.  FF Tactics the Lion War was $40 when it first came out and now it&#039;s $20.  For those who have never touched this game, $40 is quite reasonable and a bargain even.It&#039;s interesting how VC change people&#039;s perception of price, like Ikaruga was very rare and cost a ton, now it&#039;s up for grabs for 800 pts on Live arcade.It all comes down to if you must play it on day 1, and having to pay the premium accordingly.  I suppose if this is a 3-D remake like FF4, people would have no complaints w/ the price tag, yet they would be upset w/ the new rendition as opposed to sprites.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Putting it in perspectives, FF 4, 5, &amp; 6 ports on GBA did have a $29.99 MRSP, $40 might not seem that outrageous for CT DS w/ even more extras packed in, on top of the new &amp; more polished translation.</p><p>All of us are price conscious especially considering the no. of new games out there.  If you don&#8217;t mind waiting for 6 months to a year price is bound to drop.  FF Tactics the Lion War was $40 when it first came out and now it&#8217;s $20.  For those who have never touched this game, $40 is quite reasonable and a bargain even.</p><p>It&#8217;s interesting how VC change people&#8217;s perception of price, like Ikaruga was very rare and cost a ton, now it&#8217;s up for grabs for 800 pts on Live arcade.</p><p>It all comes down to if you must play it on day 1, and having to pay the premium accordingly.  I suppose if this is a 3-D remake like FF4, people would have no complaints w/ the price tag, yet they would be upset w/ the new rendition as opposed to sprites.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Aoshi00</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2008/11/30/siliconera-speaks-up-square-enix-remakes/comment-page-2/#comment-696881</link> <dc:creator>Aoshi00</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 05:05:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=22991#comment-696881</guid> <description>Putting it in perspectives, FF 4, 5, &amp; 6 ports on GBA did have a $29.99 MRSP, $40 might not seem that outrageous for CT DS w/ even more extras packed in, on top of the new &amp; more polished translation.All of us are price conscious especially considering the no. of new games out there.  If you don&#039;t mind waiting for 6 months to a year price is bound to drop.  FF Tactics the Lion War was $40 when it first came out and now it&#039;s $20.  For those who have never touched this game, $40 is quite reasonable and a bargain even.It&#039;s interesting how VC change people&#039;s perception of price, like Ikaruga was very rare and cost a ton, now it&#039;s up for grabs for 800 pts on Live arcade.It all comes down to if you must play it on day 1, and having to pay the premium accordingly.  I suppose if this is a 3-D remake like FF4, people would have no complaints w/ the price tag, yet they would be upset w/ the new rendition as opposed to sprites.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Putting it in perspectives, FF 4, 5, &amp; 6 ports on GBA did have a $29.99 MRSP, $40 might not seem that outrageous for CT DS w/ even more extras packed in, on top of the new &amp; more polished translation.</p><p>All of us are price conscious especially considering the no. of new games out there.  If you don&#8217;t mind waiting for 6 months to a year price is bound to drop.  FF Tactics the Lion War was $40 when it first came out and now it&#8217;s $20.  For those who have never touched this game, $40 is quite reasonable and a bargain even.</p><p>It&#8217;s interesting how VC change people&#8217;s perception of price, like Ikaruga was very rare and cost a ton, now it&#8217;s up for grabs for 800 pts on Live arcade.</p><p>It all comes down to if you must play it on day 1, and having to pay the premium accordingly.  I suppose if this is a 3-D remake like FF4, people would have no complaints w/ the price tag, yet they would be upset w/ the new rendition as opposed to sprites.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: EvilAkito</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2008/11/30/siliconera-speaks-up-square-enix-remakes/comment-page-2/#comment-559937</link> <dc:creator>EvilAkito</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 03:07:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=22991#comment-559937</guid> <description>@oliemoon Don&#039;t get me wrong. I don&#039;t disagree with your point at all. If gamers will pay $40 for Chrono Trigger then SE may as well price it accordingly. If it sits untouched on store shelves then they can always slash the price later. I guess I should have just said that I don&#039;t think a port of CT is worth $40.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@oliemoon<br /> Don&#8217;t get me wrong. I don&#8217;t disagree with your point at all. If gamers will pay $40 for Chrono Trigger then SE may as well price it accordingly. If it sits untouched on store shelves then they can always slash the price later. I guess I should have just said that I don&#8217;t think a port of CT is worth $40.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: EvilAkito</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2008/11/30/siliconera-speaks-up-square-enix-remakes/comment-page-2/#comment-696878</link> <dc:creator>EvilAkito</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 03:07:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=22991#comment-696878</guid> <description>@oliemoon Don&#039;t get me wrong. I don&#039;t disagree with your point at all. If gamers will pay $40 for Chrono Trigger then SE may as well price it accordingly. If it sits untouched on store shelves then they can always slash the price later. I guess I should have just said that I don&#039;t think a port of CT is worth $40.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@oliemoon<br /> Don&#8217;t get me wrong. I don&#8217;t disagree with your point at all. If gamers will pay $40 for Chrono Trigger then SE may as well price it accordingly. If it sits untouched on store shelves then they can always slash the price later. I guess I should have just said that I don&#8217;t think a port of CT is worth $40.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2008/11/30/siliconera-speaks-up-square-enix-remakes/comment-page-2/#comment-559915</link> <dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:41:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=22991#comment-559915</guid> <description>Honestly, if I really wanted to play Chrono Trigger again, it&#039;d be nice to have the option to just whip out the DS instead of either having to dig out my SNES and stick a butterly connection between my VCR and TV, to play on a rom without a proper controller, or to play the annoyingly laggy PSX version.And honestly, if Square is taking advantage of stupid people to get them to give lots of money for the same games over and over again, I&#039;m fine with that.  It stimulates the economy.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, if I really wanted to play Chrono Trigger again, it&#8217;d be nice to have the option to just whip out the DS instead of either having to dig out my SNES and stick a butterly connection between my VCR and TV, to play on a rom without a proper controller, or to play the annoyingly laggy PSX version.</p><p>And honestly, if Square is taking advantage of stupid people to get them to give lots of money for the same games over and over again, I&#8217;m fine with that.  It stimulates the economy.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2008/11/30/siliconera-speaks-up-square-enix-remakes/comment-page-2/#comment-696883</link> <dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:41:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=22991#comment-696883</guid> <description>Honestly, if I really wanted to play Chrono Trigger again, it&#039;d be nice to have the option to just whip out the DS instead of either having to dig out my SNES and stick a butterly connection between my VCR and TV, to play on a rom without a proper controller, or to play the annoyingly laggy PSX version.And honestly, if Square is taking advantage of stupid people to get them to give lots of money for the same games over and over again, I&#039;m fine with that.  It stimulates the economy.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, if I really wanted to play Chrono Trigger again, it&#8217;d be nice to have the option to just whip out the DS instead of either having to dig out my SNES and stick a butterly connection between my VCR and TV, to play on a rom without a proper controller, or to play the annoyingly laggy PSX version.</p><p>And honestly, if Square is taking advantage of stupid people to get them to give lots of money for the same games over and over again, I&#8217;m fine with that.  It stimulates the economy.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Roto13</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2008/11/30/siliconera-speaks-up-square-enix-remakes/comment-page-2/#comment-559908</link> <dc:creator>Roto13</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 16:18:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=22991#comment-559908</guid> <description>&quot;it’s not like Square Enix is making anyone buy it.&quot;Sure, but by releasing the DS version, they&#039;re denying everyone the opportunity to buy a sanely-priced Virtual Console version. They&#039;re definitely not going to release them both.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;it’s not like Square Enix is making anyone buy it.&#8221;</p><p>Sure, but by releasing the DS version, they&#8217;re denying everyone the opportunity to buy a sanely-priced Virtual Console version. They&#8217;re definitely not going to release them both.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2008/11/30/siliconera-speaks-up-square-enix-remakes/comment-page-2/#comment-696882</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 16:18:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=22991#comment-696882</guid> <description>&quot;it’s not like Square Enix is making anyone buy it.&quot;Sure, but by releasing the DS version, they&#039;re denying everyone the opportunity to buy a sanely-priced Virtual Console version. They&#039;re definitely not going to release them both.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;it’s not like Square Enix is making anyone buy it.&#8221;</p><p>Sure, but by releasing the DS version, they&#8217;re denying everyone the opportunity to buy a sanely-priced Virtual Console version. They&#8217;re definitely not going to release them both.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Aoshi00</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2008/11/30/siliconera-speaks-up-square-enix-remakes/comment-page-2/#comment-559904</link> <dc:creator>Aoshi00</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 11:41:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=22991#comment-559904</guid> <description>To be fair, I think S-E still innovate, w/ FF12&#039;s gambit and now Last Remnant&#039;s Union.  But then it&#039;s not everybody&#039;s cup of tea if they don&#039;t stick to the formula, like DQ which stayed relatively unchanged.I don&#039;t blame them though, last time Square ventured into the unknown CG movie business, it bankrupted them and resulted into the historic merger w/ former rival (regrettable due to bad script).  They still know how to make an impressive and fun RPG though, Last Remnants&#039; unforgiving boss battles still have my heart pumping despite it being turn-based.Another argument is that JRPGs were big in the 90&#039;s among teens, it was hip as the next big thing and you talk about it w/ friends in high school, while FPS and war games are the norm these days, sales-wise.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be fair, I think S-E still innovate, w/ FF12&#8242;s gambit and now Last Remnant&#8217;s Union.  But then it&#8217;s not everybody&#8217;s cup of tea if they don&#8217;t stick to the formula, like DQ which stayed relatively unchanged.</p><p>I don&#8217;t blame them though, last time Square ventured into the unknown CG movie business, it bankrupted them and resulted into the historic merger w/ former rival (regrettable due to bad script).  They still know how to make an impressive and fun RPG though, Last Remnants&#8217; unforgiving boss battles still have my heart pumping despite it being turn-based.</p><p>Another argument is that JRPGs were big in the 90&#8242;s among teens, it was hip as the next big thing and you talk about it w/ friends in high school, while FPS and war games are the norm these days, sales-wise.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Aoshi00</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2008/11/30/siliconera-speaks-up-square-enix-remakes/comment-page-2/#comment-696884</link> <dc:creator>Aoshi00</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 11:41:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=22991#comment-696884</guid> <description>To be fair, I think S-E still innovate, w/ FF12&#039;s gambit and now Last Remnant&#039;s Union.  But then it&#039;s not everybody&#039;s cup of tea if they don&#039;t stick to the formula, like DQ which stayed relatively unchanged.I don&#039;t blame them though, last time Square ventured into the unknown CG movie business, it bankrupted them and resulted into the historic merger w/ former rival (regrettable due to bad script).  They still know how to make an impressive and fun RPG though, Last Remnants&#039; unforgiving boss battles still have my heart pumping despite it being turn-based.Another argument is that JRPGs were big in the 90&#039;s among teens, it was hip as the next big thing and you talk about it w/ friends in high school, while FPS and war games are the norm these days, sales-wise.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be fair, I think S-E still innovate, w/ FF12&#8242;s gambit and now Last Remnant&#8217;s Union.  But then it&#8217;s not everybody&#8217;s cup of tea if they don&#8217;t stick to the formula, like DQ which stayed relatively unchanged.</p><p>I don&#8217;t blame them though, last time Square ventured into the unknown CG movie business, it bankrupted them and resulted into the historic merger w/ former rival (regrettable due to bad script).  They still know how to make an impressive and fun RPG though, Last Remnants&#8217; unforgiving boss battles still have my heart pumping despite it being turn-based.</p><p>Another argument is that JRPGs were big in the 90&#8242;s among teens, it was hip as the next big thing and you talk about it w/ friends in high school, while FPS and war games are the norm these days, sales-wise.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: cesca</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2008/11/30/siliconera-speaks-up-square-enix-remakes/comment-page-2/#comment-559903</link> <dc:creator>cesca</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 11:27:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=22991#comment-559903</guid> <description>I&#039;m also torn in respect to this issue - while I&#039;m glad this CT release may open the door for a new entry in the series, I think it&#039;s grossly overpriced for a 13 year old game that even didn&#039;t get a facelift.Though I&#039;m afraid of a new CT sequel, because as it is SE will spoil it with it&#039;s &quot;modern&quot; touch - I&#039;d hate to see a CT sequel written by the the KH team and with designs by Nomura.While I&#039;m loving the fanservice of Dissidia and the likes, it&#039;s quite disappointing that Japan&#039;s biggest company has to feed off on 20 years of nostalgia to make a profit and hasn&#039;t pushed the envelope for what it&#039;s know for in at least 5 or 6 years. Now wonder their desperate.Where is the SE of the mid 90s? CT, CC, PE, FFVI-IX, XG, Musashi, all those games are priceless memories I have and it seems that after the merger the only relevant SE stuff that&#039;s been released for me comes from the Enix side, with the exception of Crisis Core.They need to remind themselves of what made them big back then, and try to improve on it.Cloud &amp; Co. derivative products are such a hit because Square didn&#039;t abuse them or even use them for a long time after the release of the game, that made them unique, classic and memorable.They should stop abusing for a while because the magic juice will be sucked out and their cash cow will die.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m also torn in respect to this issue &#8211; while I&#8217;m glad this CT release may open the door for a new entry in the series, I think it&#8217;s grossly overpriced for a 13 year old game that even didn&#8217;t get a facelift.</p><p>Though I&#8217;m afraid of a new CT sequel, because as it is SE will spoil it with it&#8217;s &#8220;modern&#8221; touch &#8211; I&#8217;d hate to see a CT sequel written by the the KH team and with designs by Nomura.</p><p>While I&#8217;m loving the fanservice of Dissidia and the likes, it&#8217;s quite disappointing that Japan&#8217;s biggest company has to feed off on 20 years of nostalgia to make a profit and hasn&#8217;t pushed the envelope for what it&#8217;s know for in at least 5 or 6 years. Now wonder their desperate.</p><p>Where is the SE of the mid 90s? CT, CC, PE, FFVI-IX, XG, Musashi, all those games are priceless memories I have and it seems that after the merger the only relevant SE stuff that&#8217;s been released for me comes from the Enix side, with the exception of Crisis Core.</p><p>They need to remind themselves of what made them big back then, and try to improve on it.</p><p>Cloud &amp; Co. derivative products are such a hit because Square didn&#8217;t abuse them or even use them for a long time after the release of the game, that made them unique, classic and memorable.</p><p>They should stop abusing for a while because the magic juice will be sucked out and their cash cow will die.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/21 queries in 0.092 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 636/640 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via storage.siliconera.com

Served from: www.siliconera.com @ 2012-02-11 18:57:27 -->
