<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Nintendo Patent Reveals The Wii Remote Was Originally Made For The Gamecube</title> <atom:link href="http://www.siliconera.com/2009/01/08/nintendos-patent-reveals-the-wii-remote-was-originally-made-for-the-gamecube/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2009/01/08/nintendos-patent-reveals-the-wii-remote-was-originally-made-for-the-gamecube/</link> <description>The secret level in the world of video game news.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 01:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Receipt Printer</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2009/01/08/nintendos-patent-reveals-the-wii-remote-was-originally-made-for-the-gamecube/comment-page-1/#comment-580294</link> <dc:creator>Receipt Printer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 02:33:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=25451#comment-580294</guid> <description>test</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>test</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Joanna</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2009/01/08/nintendos-patent-reveals-the-wii-remote-was-originally-made-for-the-gamecube/comment-page-1/#comment-561662</link> <dc:creator>Joanna</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:20:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=25451#comment-561662</guid> <description>actually the way I see it, Microsoft and Sony are a lot more aggressive with new consoles than Nintendo. Nintendo is always the last one to put forth their new next gen console. (if I am mistaken I apologize, my memory with dates is really bad XD). When Nintendo has a monopoly, like it did in handhelds with the GB/C, it takes them awhile to put forth the next gen handheld. They usually just make minor updates. I&#039;m sure that the same will happen with the DS, the DSi is only extending the DSes life; Nintendo will most likely not introduce a the next generation DS until at least 2010, since they practically have a monopoly in the handheld department as of now. Just something I noticed. :D</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actually the way I see it, Microsoft and Sony are a lot more aggressive with new consoles than Nintendo. Nintendo is always the last one to put forth their new next gen console. (if I am mistaken I apologize, my memory with dates is really bad XD). When Nintendo has a monopoly, like it did in handhelds with the GB/C, it takes them awhile to put forth the next gen handheld. They usually just make minor updates. I&#8217;m sure that the same will happen with the DS, the DSi is only extending the DSes life; Nintendo will most likely not introduce a the next generation DS until at least 2010, since they practically have a monopoly in the handheld department as of now. Just something I noticed. :D</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Joanna</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2009/01/08/nintendos-patent-reveals-the-wii-remote-was-originally-made-for-the-gamecube/comment-page-1/#comment-698596</link> <dc:creator>Joanna</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:20:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=25451#comment-698596</guid> <description>actually the way I see it, Microsoft and Sony are a lot more aggressive with new consoles than Nintendo. Nintendo is always the last one to put forth their new next gen console. (if I am mistaken I apologize, my memory with dates is really bad XD). When Nintendo has a monopoly, like it did in handhelds with the GB/C, it takes them awhile to put forth the next gen handheld. They usually just make minor updates. I&#039;m sure that the same will happen with the DS, the DSi is only extending the DSes life; Nintendo will most likely not introduce a the next generation DS until at least 2010, since they practically have a monopoly in the handheld department as of now. Just something I noticed. :D</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actually the way I see it, Microsoft and Sony are a lot more aggressive with new consoles than Nintendo. Nintendo is always the last one to put forth their new next gen console. (if I am mistaken I apologize, my memory with dates is really bad XD). When Nintendo has a monopoly, like it did in handhelds with the GB/C, it takes them awhile to put forth the next gen handheld. They usually just make minor updates. I&#8217;m sure that the same will happen with the DS, the DSi is only extending the DSes life; Nintendo will most likely not introduce a the next generation DS until at least 2010, since they practically have a monopoly in the handheld department as of now. Just something I noticed. :D</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jarrod</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2009/01/08/nintendos-patent-reveals-the-wii-remote-was-originally-made-for-the-gamecube/comment-page-1/#comment-561540</link> <dc:creator>jarrod</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:14:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=25451#comment-561540</guid> <description>I thought this was common knowledge already honestly?  Iwata&#039;s comments back in 2004/2005 (where he talked about extending GCN&#039;s lifecycle through peripherals) sort of retroactively supports it too.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought this was common knowledge already honestly?  Iwata&#8217;s comments back in 2004/2005 (where he talked about extending GCN&#8217;s lifecycle through peripherals) sort of retroactively supports it too.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2009/01/08/nintendos-patent-reveals-the-wii-remote-was-originally-made-for-the-gamecube/comment-page-1/#comment-698588</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:14:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=25451#comment-698588</guid> <description>I thought this was common knowledge already honestly?  Iwata&#039;s comments back in 2004/2005 (where he talked about extending GCN&#039;s lifecycle through peripherals) sort of retroactively supports it too.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought this was common knowledge already honestly?  Iwata&#8217;s comments back in 2004/2005 (where he talked about extending GCN&#8217;s lifecycle through peripherals) sort of retroactively supports it too.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2009/01/08/nintendos-patent-reveals-the-wii-remote-was-originally-made-for-the-gamecube/comment-page-1/#comment-698589</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:14:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=25451#comment-698589</guid> <description>I thought this was common knowledge already honestly?  Iwata&#039;s comments back in 2004/2005 (where he talked about extending GCN&#039;s lifecycle through peripherals) sort of retroactively supports it too.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought this was common knowledge already honestly?  Iwata&#8217;s comments back in 2004/2005 (where he talked about extending GCN&#8217;s lifecycle through peripherals) sort of retroactively supports it too.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mirko</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2009/01/08/nintendos-patent-reveals-the-wii-remote-was-originally-made-for-the-gamecube/comment-page-1/#comment-561533</link> <dc:creator>Mirko</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 14:03:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=25451#comment-561533</guid> <description>@SpencerThat sounds (quite) a bit fishy. :DAnyway, obviously there are GC games that greatly benefit from the remote (Pikmin, wooo!), and I&#039;m glad I&#039;m getting them on Wii now instead of remote compatibility for the GC in 2006/7, FWIW.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Spencer</p><p>That sounds (quite) a bit fishy. :D</p><p>Anyway, obviously there are GC games that greatly benefit from the remote (Pikmin, wooo!), and I&#8217;m glad I&#8217;m getting them on Wii now instead of remote compatibility for the GC in 2006/7, FWIW.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MadMirko</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2009/01/08/nintendos-patent-reveals-the-wii-remote-was-originally-made-for-the-gamecube/comment-page-1/#comment-698586</link> <dc:creator>MadMirko</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 14:03:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=25451#comment-698586</guid> <description>@SpencerThat sounds (quite) a bit fishy. :DAnyway, obviously there are GC games that greatly benefit from the remote (Pikmin, wooo!), and I&#039;m glad I&#039;m getting them on Wii now instead of remote compatibility for the GC in 2006/7, FWIW.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Spencer</p><p>That sounds (quite) a bit fishy. :D</p><p>Anyway, obviously there are GC games that greatly benefit from the remote (Pikmin, wooo!), and I&#8217;m glad I&#8217;m getting them on Wii now instead of remote compatibility for the GC in 2006/7, FWIW.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MadMirko</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2009/01/08/nintendos-patent-reveals-the-wii-remote-was-originally-made-for-the-gamecube/comment-page-1/#comment-698587</link> <dc:creator>MadMirko</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 14:03:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=25451#comment-698587</guid> <description>@SpencerThat sounds (quite) a bit fishy. :DAnyway, obviously there are GC games that greatly benefit from the remote (Pikmin, wooo!), and I&#039;m glad I&#039;m getting them on Wii now instead of remote compatibility for the GC in 2006/7, FWIW.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Spencer</p><p>That sounds (quite) a bit fishy. :D</p><p>Anyway, obviously there are GC games that greatly benefit from the remote (Pikmin, wooo!), and I&#8217;m glad I&#8217;m getting them on Wii now instead of remote compatibility for the GC in 2006/7, FWIW.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Spencer</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2009/01/08/nintendos-patent-reveals-the-wii-remote-was-originally-made-for-the-gamecube/comment-page-1/#comment-561530</link> <dc:creator>Spencer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 08:57:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=25451#comment-561530</guid> <description>@Chow - The remote wouldn&#039;t have caught on as well that way. Since the remote wasn&#039;t guaranteed be in everybody&#039;s home publishers wouldn&#039;t have backed it.Also, from a business standpoint, selling new consoles means money for Nintendo and obviously they want to make money. I really don&#039;t understand why the Wii is so hard to find in the US though. I mean I see US Wiis on store shelves around the world that aren&#039;t even in the US!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chow &#8211; The remote wouldn&#8217;t have caught on as well that way. Since the remote wasn&#8217;t guaranteed be in everybody&#8217;s home publishers wouldn&#8217;t have backed it.</p><p>Also, from a business standpoint, selling new consoles means money for Nintendo and obviously they want to make money. I really don&#8217;t understand why the Wii is so hard to find in the US though. I mean I see US Wiis on store shelves around the world that aren&#8217;t even in the US!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Spencer</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2009/01/08/nintendos-patent-reveals-the-wii-remote-was-originally-made-for-the-gamecube/comment-page-1/#comment-698595</link> <dc:creator>Spencer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 08:57:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=25451#comment-698595</guid> <description>@Chow - The remote wouldn&#039;t have caught on as well that way. Since the remote wasn&#039;t guaranteed be in everybody&#039;s home publishers wouldn&#039;t have backed it.Also, from a business standpoint, selling new consoles means money for Nintendo and obviously they want to make money. I really don&#039;t understand why the Wii is so hard to find in the US though. I mean I see US Wiis on store shelves around the world that aren&#039;t even in the US!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chow &#8211; The remote wouldn&#8217;t have caught on as well that way. Since the remote wasn&#8217;t guaranteed be in everybody&#8217;s home publishers wouldn&#8217;t have backed it.</p><p>Also, from a business standpoint, selling new consoles means money for Nintendo and obviously they want to make money. I really don&#8217;t understand why the Wii is so hard to find in the US though. I mean I see US Wiis on store shelves around the world that aren&#8217;t even in the US!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chow</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2009/01/08/nintendos-patent-reveals-the-wii-remote-was-originally-made-for-the-gamecube/comment-page-1/#comment-561529</link> <dc:creator>Chow</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 08:46:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=25451#comment-561529</guid> <description>What I don&#039;t understand is that they could&#039;ve just saved everybody the cost of the Wii and just released that peripheral for the GameCube.  Sure, some games might require more than one disc and there&#039;d be no Wii Store, but it&#039;d save them a lot of troubles hunting down the system.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I don&#8217;t understand is that they could&#8217;ve just saved everybody the cost of the Wii and just released that peripheral for the GameCube.  Sure, some games might require more than one disc and there&#8217;d be no Wii Store, but it&#8217;d save them a lot of troubles hunting down the system.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chow</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2009/01/08/nintendos-patent-reveals-the-wii-remote-was-originally-made-for-the-gamecube/comment-page-1/#comment-698594</link> <dc:creator>Chow</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 08:46:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=25451#comment-698594</guid> <description>What I don&#039;t understand is that they could&#039;ve just saved everybody the cost of the Wii and just released that peripheral for the GameCube.  Sure, some games might require more than one disc and there&#039;d be no Wii Store, but it&#039;d save them a lot of troubles hunting down the system.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I don&#8217;t understand is that they could&#8217;ve just saved everybody the cost of the Wii and just released that peripheral for the GameCube.  Sure, some games might require more than one disc and there&#8217;d be no Wii Store, but it&#8217;d save them a lot of troubles hunting down the system.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Spencer</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2009/01/08/nintendos-patent-reveals-the-wii-remote-was-originally-made-for-the-gamecube/comment-page-1/#comment-561528</link> <dc:creator>Spencer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 08:29:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=25451#comment-561528</guid> <description>@Mirko - Not really. The patent also includes information about a dongle which was used to connect the remote to some other hardware, namely the Gamecube which is shown in the figure. Also, patents have to be specific you can&#039;t patent &quot;only when wearing trousers that do not reach your knees.&quot;There’s nothing wrong with the fact that Nintendo designed the Wii remote for the Gamecube. In fact, it was a brilliant decision for them to hold the remote back for the Wii since if it was released as a late accessory it wouldn’t have done so well.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mirko &#8211; Not really. The patent also includes information about a dongle which was used to connect the remote to some other hardware, namely the Gamecube which is shown in the figure. Also, patents have to be specific you can&#8217;t patent &#8220;only when wearing trousers that do not reach your knees.&#8221;</p><p>There’s nothing wrong with the fact that Nintendo designed the Wii remote for the Gamecube. In fact, it was a brilliant decision for them to hold the remote back for the Wii since if it was released as a late accessory it wouldn’t have done so well.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Spencer</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2009/01/08/nintendos-patent-reveals-the-wii-remote-was-originally-made-for-the-gamecube/comment-page-1/#comment-698592</link> <dc:creator>Spencer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 08:29:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=25451#comment-698592</guid> <description>@Mirko - Not really. The patent also includes information about a dongle which was used to connect the remote to some other hardware, namely the Gamecube which is shown in the figure. Also, patents have to be specific you can&#039;t patent &quot;only when wearing trousers that do not reach your knees.&quot;There’s nothing wrong with the fact that Nintendo designed the Wii remote for the Gamecube. In fact, it was a brilliant decision for them to hold the remote back for the Wii since if it was released as a late accessory it wouldn’t have done so well.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mirko &#8211; Not really. The patent also includes information about a dongle which was used to connect the remote to some other hardware, namely the Gamecube which is shown in the figure. Also, patents have to be specific you can&#8217;t patent &#8220;only when wearing trousers that do not reach your knees.&#8221;</p><p>There’s nothing wrong with the fact that Nintendo designed the Wii remote for the Gamecube. In fact, it was a brilliant decision for them to hold the remote back for the Wii since if it was released as a late accessory it wouldn’t have done so well.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 3/20 queries in 0.672 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 637/637 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via storage.siliconera.com

Served from: www.siliconera.com @ 2012-02-12 05:13:58 -->
