Comments on: Eyes On Luminous Arc 3

By: amc99788

amc99788 — Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:00:03 +0000

OMG I HOPE THIS GONNA GET LOCALIZED!!
GO GO ATLUS!!!

By: amc99788

amc99788 — Thu, 13 Aug 2009 07:00:03 +0000

OMG I HOPE THIS GONNA GET LOCALIZED!!
GO GO ATLUS!!!

By: Joanna

Joanna — Tue, 11 Aug 2009 21:08:18 +0000

you aren't. LA and LA2 are not set in the same world. There are character cameos, but they are minor (and these two characters state they came from another world). The story doesn't carry over. The only thing the games share is that you play as a young knight who gets a harem of witches (plus a few non-witches as well). =P

By: Jenni

Jenni — Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:59:31 +0000

As long as they keep making new entries in the Luminous Arc series, I'll keep buying them up. They're just so much fun, especially the Wi-Fi part!

By: BraveWind

BraveWind — Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:49:47 +0000

I got Luminous Arc still unfinished (I am playing it though, everyday) and Luminous Arc with the Art Book or one and two and now Three is coming, gotta say the game is somewhat nice to play =3

By: Mr_Qoo

Mr_Qoo — Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:36:27 +0000

Yeah, not every game has to be a challenge (at least not to me). Sometimes, I like to chill out with a game. People say what's the point? Well, what's the point in watching some mindless sitcom on TV? Entertainment. =P

I picked up LA2 but skipped on LA1 since I hear it's not as good. I doubt I'm missing “key” story elements of this series by the looks of it.

By: Divals

Divals — Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:56:01 +0000

Why I eyes ya!

By: Spencer

Spencer — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 22:24:12 +0000

But… his name is “Refi” or maybe Lefi according to the story screenshot and battle screenshot. So, I don't think he's Heath.

By: Joanna

Joanna — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 20:05:56 +0000

ok, I just noticed that the subheading for LA3 is really weird. EYES?! weird. Thankfully, Atlus didn't include will (which was a much superior subheading), so they probably won't include eyes.

By: Anon

Anon — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 20:04:05 +0000

I'm glad to see this announced. I liked the first one and the second one was excellent.

I like the character designs a lot so far. One of my problems with the first two games were the bland main characters, but the hero(?) of this one looks good. All five characters shown so far are interesting.

I hope though that all the characters get proper intermissions and endings this time. That was my main problem with 2.

By: Joanna

Joanna — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 20:03:27 +0000

haha, it's the opposite for me. LA and LA2 are one of the few games I have actually finished!

By: JeremyR

JeremyR — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:45:42 +0000

LA 1 & 2 make up 33% of the games I own for the DS, but in both, I get somewhere in the middle and lose interest.

Oh well, the artbook that came with 2 was pretty cool.

By: Nyanyaan

Nyanyaan — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:48:14 +0000

Heh was just thinking the same thing. I certainly would not use it to 'prove' how the LAs are a poor job. In fact, for the amount of focus that they have on the 'fun and fanservicey' both LA and LA2 are more than worth a play.

And I'd almost put the Disgaea port above Valkyrie…….not only is the latter from a deeper end of the SRPG pool, it also exists in comparison to earlier VP titles.

By: Ishaan

Ishaan — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:14:41 +0000

Can't we forget Tactics A2 ever happened? >_>

By: MadMirko

MadMirko — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:50:37 +0000

If you like the first one, you'll probably enjoy the second at least as much. People usually ask “why go for LA when there are better SRPGs on DS” (usually FFTA2, VP:COTP, SMT:DS, etc), but there are few games like LA.

I'd say go for it. :)