<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Square Enix Thought About Doing Something With Peggle</title> <atom:link href="http://www.siliconera.com/2009/11/11/square-enix-thought-about-doing-something-with-peggle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2009/11/11/square-enix-thought-about-doing-something-with-peggle/</link> <description>The secret level in the world of video game news.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 01:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Alexander Shen</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2009/11/11/square-enix-thought-about-doing-something-with-peggle/comment-page-1/#comment-619198</link> <dc:creator>Alexander Shen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 03:15:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=51746#comment-619198</guid> <description>Makes you wonder if this is the fault of upper management, contracts with the publisher or whatever. I&#039;m sure the developer wasn&#039;t trying to make a bunch of spinoffs that didn&#039;t do well, but it just happened to be this way.  I do agree that it is unfortunate that the developer never really rose above the spotlight of PQ.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Makes you wonder if this is the fault of upper management, contracts with the publisher or whatever. I&#39;m sure the developer wasn&#39;t trying to make a bunch of spinoffs that didn&#39;t do well, but it just happened to be this way.  I do agree that it is unfortunate that the developer never really rose above the spotlight of PQ.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alexander Shen</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2009/11/11/square-enix-thought-about-doing-something-with-peggle/comment-page-1/#comment-586080</link> <dc:creator>Alexander Shen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:15:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=51746#comment-586080</guid> <description>Makes you wonder if this is the fault of upper management, contracts with the publisher or whatever. I&#039;m sure the developer wasn&#039;t trying to make a bunch of spinoffs that didn&#039;t do well, but it just happened to be this way.  I do agree that it is unfortunate that the developer never really rose above the spotlight of PQ.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Makes you wonder if this is the fault of upper management, contracts with the publisher or whatever. I&#39;m sure the developer wasn&#39;t trying to make a bunch of spinoffs that didn&#39;t do well, but it just happened to be this way.  I do agree that it is unfortunate that the developer never really rose above the spotlight of PQ.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: TheCleaningGuy</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2009/11/11/square-enix-thought-about-doing-something-with-peggle/comment-page-1/#comment-585800</link> <dc:creator>TheCleaningGuy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 04:13:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=51746#comment-585800</guid> <description>Squeggle?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Squeggle?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JeremyR</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2009/11/11/square-enix-thought-about-doing-something-with-peggle/comment-page-1/#comment-585794</link> <dc:creator>JeremyR</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 02:58:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/?p=51746#comment-585794</guid> <description>I kind of feel sorry for the Infinite Interactive guys, they had a big hit with PuzzleQuest, but sort of failed to have any sort of momentum with it. Instead they seem to have frittered away any value the IP (and concept) had with an array of bad DS spinoffs instead of doing a proper sequel.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kind of feel sorry for the Infinite Interactive guys, they had a big hit with PuzzleQuest, but sort of failed to have any sort of momentum with it. Instead they seem to have frittered away any value the IP (and concept) had with an array of bad DS spinoffs instead of doing a proper sequel.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/10 queries in 0.069 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 415/419 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via storage.siliconera.com

Served from: www.siliconera.com @ 2012-02-11 23:56:45 -->
