Tales Of Graces F Heading To PlayStation 3

By Spencer . July 28, 2010 . 7:54am

Tales Of Graces F Heading To PlayStation 3Jump magazine revealed Namco Bandai’s big Tales announcements. The first is a PlayStation 3 port of Tales of Graces called Tales of Graces F.

 

Tales of Graces F adds special moves, extra story scenes, and a new costume for Sophie to the 2009 Wii game.

 

Tales of Graces F is scheduled to come out later this year, during winter time.


Read more stories about & & on Siliconera.


  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1472407455 Charles Lupula

    As I said below, I don't count portable systems. They're not for me and the PS2 is a last gen system. It doesn't count anymore. I mean, hell, there were a ton of fighting games on the Saturn, but if someone wanted to know what system to buy to play fighting games, I would recommend a CURRENT one.

  • lostinblue

    You're right, I'm sorry for that omission.

    Portables are more popular now in Japan than home console's, and Dragon Quest IX clearly broke a wall of developer acceptance/resistance for putting a flagship title on a underpowered handheld, if they're smart I actually see lots of RPG flagship titles actually migrating to portables in 1/2 hardware generations, even because the technical gap should shrink a little.

    I don't prefer it, since I'm a home console guy… but hell, I can't ignore it.

    I think due to that though, DS turned out to be the best nintendo platform ever, even better than SNES in that regard. Ten years from now I could still be playing RPG's I hadn't had the time to do so before, the backcatalog is just so big. On the PSP… while I know what you said, I mostly play ports. (the disgaea ones and now persona 3)

  • lostinblue

    Do you prefer team destiny or team symphonia titles? providing one or the other, you should have your answer.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1472407455 Charles Lupula

    Oh no. You dislike my post. I am not sure I can go on. Your opinion means that much to me. lol

  • malek86

    I don't really know. Until 2008, the DS was getting the vast majority of the RPGs, but from 2009 onwards developers seem to have changed focus, and right now the PSP might be getting even more support than the DS. In lifetime numbers though, the DS is probably still in first place.

    Either way, this is a good time to be a portable console player. If you don't like portables, sucks for you, I guess.

  • lostinblue

    I dislike the fact you insist on points that disregard what I'm really saying.

    Everyone here has platform preferences, yes; you and me, and I don't attack you for being a pro-ps3 guy; but I wasn't saying what I was due to them, as said above, I'm not against the port, so this is all besides the point.

    Now, there's ports and ports, and let me argue that yet another port with enhanced content on PS3 might not be wise on the sense that, for now every game released on another platform will be expected on the PS3 one year from then, in a directors cut form, meaning they might be killing sales on other platforms by making this the norm (even if they're obliged to, by sony's extra's policy). That might work against them, but other than that a port is a port, and YES, I'm not against it in anyway, and if this was coming out of japan I'd be at least happy for you guys, even if I think ours should come too. (I don't see how is this hypocrite)

    If you want to go on with one liners… go on, but I ask you to not misinterpret what I'm saying when I'm trying to make a point, or try to take credibility from what I'm defending with petty points.

  • lostinblue

    You don't talk about portables in the post I'm replying to, so it's natural to assume you're talking in general terms.

    I count the PS2 as a platform still, and it's line-up and the line-up it had with 5 years of RPG's shamed the 5 years of RPG on the 3 platforms combined. But that's up for you to exclude or not. If someone wants to play RPG's on a console I'll still recommend a PS2 though.

    As for PS3… I gotta say (throwing out the war hammer, you were hostile towards me and I disliked that, but keeping that hostility thing on my account would be stupid, as I just want to give my opinion as everyone else here, not being haunted by comments saying I'm hypocrite beneath them) some of it's RPG line-up looks good, but it's still too short, it has more X360 ports than the Wii has PS2 ports when it comes to RPG's, and most of the time they're inferior.

    Nippon ichi is getting there but stuff like Last Rebellion is crappy and Cross Edge is pretty much irrelevant. Disgaea 3 and Ar Tonelico 3 though, are not.

    Other than that, there's Demon Souls and a few more RPG's, including FF versus XIII (which doesn't interest me) and white knight 1/2… the future line-up is promising enough, but it's not looking better than Wii's own looked in 2008, with new tales, and marvelous rpg line-up looking. It's still kinda bland though, which is my point.

    And those titles I spoke about, who were coming out in 2008 on the wii, are out already making for a pretty good range of good games.

    If it keeps up, and the wii in the height of the Dragon Quest X thing doesn't pick up a little, it'll be the best RPG platform in the end, yes, I agree. but IMO, it's still not.

    I trully don't know if I'd recommend it over the wii for RPG's; I know I'd recomend a DS and a PS2 above both of them though.

  • lostinblue

    Hmmm, exclusive PSP ones (taking square-enix attempts aside) seem to be more like escort titles for home console ones to me, or simply experiments next to the full fledged RPG's that are being released elsewhere.

    I mean, this week DS got radiate historia from a team of outcasts from radiata stories… and what are we talking about in the psp side of the fence? a Ogre battle remake and Phantom brave.

    It's fine, but it's still not quite as good, IMO.

    I agree the PSP is getting more spotlight now, on a regular basis, even because the 3rd birtday looks awesome, and still has high profile stuff like ffxiii agito coming, which is a confidence meter to other developers on the fact it's not gonna be thrown away overnight, they still have time on that market until it colapses… at least until FFXIII agito releases.

    But it's still too little too late. It has no chance of trumphing the DS line-up at this point.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Christopher-Lex/100000442356406 Christopher Lex

    Did I get it right?
    1.) Release a piece of garbage game on the Wii (Dawn of the New World)
    2.) Complain that the Wii doesn't sell games / Complain about the Wii/DS market
    3.) Release a good game with way too much bugs between FFXIII and NSMBW
    4.) Complain about the sales and complain about the market/Wii again
    5.) Port the good game on the PS3
    6.) Say that the game sold good.

    Is that how Scamco/Bamco works these days?

  • thebanditking

    I can explain Bamco bringing out Magna Carta 2, though I can't offer hard proof (as no one admits to this stuff), Magna Carta is a direct result of all the “deals” MS made with Namco for the 360 (Vesperia, Ace Combat, Dream Club). MS wanted to expand its user base with the 360, not just in other regions but within NA as well, thus for the sake of Japanese sales and American sales of popular Japanese games MS aggressively went after publishers like Namco, Sqeenix, and Konami. Now of course everyone can see that, what most don't see is how that translated to other titles.

    We all know MS paid boatloads of cash to get some of these games exclusively on 360, but they did not just hand out cash and walk out the door. These cash dowries came with a contract, the contracts basically stated that with this money you not only agree to give us (insert game) for a specified period of time but you will also publish some of our own first party funded games under your name. Here is the only proof anyone will ever see, MS got Tales of Vesperia & Ace Combat, but as part of that deal Bamco had to publish Magna Carta II, which was originally funded and to be brought out by MS games studios. Don”t buy it? Square-Enix signed a deal that gave 360 Star Ocean 4 & The Last Remnant (S-E got the best of that deal huh?) and in exchange S-E published Infinite Undiscovery for MS (Tri-Ace confirmed this). Now Konami, they signed a deal to make the next Metal Gear day and date with the PS3 release and exclusive US marketing for the 360 version, as part of that deal Konami published Ninety Nine Nights 2 for MS.

  • thebanditking

    Spencer you can defend them all you want but do me a favor will you? Next time you interview them can you please convey how much everyone hates them? I really just don't think they understand how much animosity there is for them as a company. I know that sounds like a good way to close the door on interviews for you, but for a website that primarily focuses on JP games and localized releases what good are Namco (with their current strategy) to you any way?

  • thebanditking

    Not true, Namco said “no plans” for Eternal Sonata on PS3 but that was just during the 360 exclusivity period. I had direct confirmation from a Namco employee that Eternal Sonata was releasing on PS3 a good 8 months before the reveal. That same employee says with regard to these new titles “no plans” so I think they really mean it this time. Namco has shifted their business model to be even stupider then the one they used previously. Honestly I think they should just close down US operation for a few years, clean out the Management running US/EU and collectively pull their head out of their ass. They don't even have PS1 classics up on the PSN (not even in JP yet), these are very, very stupid people we are dealing with.

  • malek86

    thebanditking: technically speaking, I can't say that's a bad thing, because as a result we got those games. Some of those would have probably stayed in Japan, weren't it for MS.

    I wonder if Sony would pay for some Tales. Sounds like the only way we could have them…

  • thebanditking

    Bingo, Namco had plans to release Eternal Sonata,Tales of Vesperia (for 360) and Symphonia 2 right from the start, and openly stated that fact. Knowing that they are doing nothing right now is more then worrying.

  • thebanditking

    I would say yes, as I said before the Wii game was a buggy mess, they fixed it up to be a “less” buggy mess. It would need more work to be released over here and unless Nintendo is going to offer to help the Dev team is already focused on the PS3 release. Graces on PS3 probably won't happen Graces on Wii will never happen, in my humble opinion.

  • thebanditking

    I honestly don't care, I'm always going to buy Sony's next PlayStation so thats fine by me as long as we get the games right? Honestly I think if we want these titles we need to ask Sony. Why? Because they need their fans more then ever, and seem to listen to them too. Does anyone here really think Sega decided to bring Yakuza 3 (and now 4) over because they genuinely thought it was a good idea? Or is it because Sony was hounded on the PS blog repeatedly over the last 2 years with 'Bring out Yakuza 3″? I swear it was mentioned at least once in every post on the blog and eventually things hit home. I would bet Sony worked with Sega to bring the series back over and look how fast Sony admitted that 3D Dot Heroes was coming.

  • thebanditking

    in reply to your other post:
    Oh I agree completely, the nature of the “deals” is questionable but the end result works just fine for me. I agree with asking Sony for these as well, it worked for Yakuza…..

  • malek86

    That would work for me too. But I'm afraid there's not much demand for this stuff. MS did it because they wanted to grow in the japanese market, while Sony doesn't really need to. And Yakuza is apparently much more successful than Tales right now…

  • lostinblue

    @ thebanditking makes sense, and like you pointed out those are a lot of coincidences. thanks for the insigth.

  • thebanditking

    Nah, I did say pretend. I still hate them and likely always will, I have hated them since the PS1 when even then their releases were dodgy. Its only recently that they have put the final nails in the coffin for me, it began with the real Tales of Destiny 2, then Tales of Rebirth, then Tekken 4 (sucked), then SoulCalibur 3, then no PS1 classics, then SoulCalibur 4(double suck!), no Tales of Rebirth on PSP, Tekken 6 (sucked again, its like they try to make bad games, lol) and now this mess. I would not even have Tales of Eternia on PSP if Namco EU did not localize it. Thats just the Namco half of it, don't even get me started on Bandai and their lack of blu-ray anime releases.

  • lostinblue

    I agree, I'm not a Sony supporter, but they are making the right moves to ensure the satisfaction of their consumer now that they're not in a market leading position, going the extra mile in some cases too. Which is a lot different than their last gen stance.

    It's oh so different than MS too, considering they dropped Xbox 1 after 4 years since it wasn't profitable (pretty much the same error Sega Saturn committed back in the 90's); Sony by any means is sticking up to their platform, realizing they better not destroy/outcast their brand and userbase to rush onto yet another bandwagon and having to start anew. They're taking one for the team basically, and taking it with honor.

    I gotta respect them for that.

    On the Tales complaint account though, I care in the sense that they shouldn't make these port things as a rule, something expectable, because next gen when they do a “exclusive tales release” elsewhere they might hinder their own sales since the userbase knows “hey these versions are basically beta, bugs and extra content will be added a year from now on <insert playstation platform>” such rule being established would be bad on Playstation or Nintendo consoles… makes no difference, it's just bad for the franchise, IMO. Other than that I have no queries with the port. If only it came out here along with the Wii version.

  • lostinblue

    Pretty much, you only forgot:

    1b.) To fluster the garbage game on Wii further, announce a main one, made by the team who made the original game to whose the garbage game is a sequel with recycled assets and tout it as “THE NEXT GAME FROM TEAM SYMPHONIA”, put that title on the FPS nest console that sells as much on a weekly base in Japan as the more-than-undead wonderswan in Japan

    1c.) Watch it crash and burn, be sure to bring popcorn

    3b.) But it's okay because it's timed exclusive and now we have a reason to… port the “good”, Team Symphonia HD game to PS3. *happy dance*

    3c.) But don't release it outside Japan! Let the poor PS3 owners outside burn

    4b.) Post losses on the subsidiary Tales Studio in your year report, try to give the impression you're going through bad times to justify whatever stupid move you do next, including stuff like not releasing the last 5 Tales of games outside Japan after Dawn of the New World selling good for what it is, and Vesperia selling more than Tales of the Abyss despite being in the worse platform for RPG's it can be.

    7.) Don't localize BOTH, despite outcries from communities all over the world who'd love to give your company their money.

    It's like the sonic cycle, except even stupider.

  • thebanditking

    You know I completely forgot about that, until I went to import something yesterday and was shocked by the massive difference in price (something that was $219.99 was now $357.80!) Still that's not why Bamco is not bringing these titles out as during the PS2/PS1 days they were just as dodgy.

  • thebanditking

    I would seem that way now, but a year and a half back it sure didn't. I agree that while PS3/360 share some of the RPG's the PS3 version has extras that 360 does not (in most cases). I was glad I held off on buying SO4, and Eternal Sonata because the PS3 ver. ended up with more content. Though with Vesperia I read the writing on the wall and picked up the collectors ed. while Amazon still stocked it and I'm glad too because we still have not seen the “full” version release here.

  • thebanditking

    Really? Even if PS3 shares some of its RPG's with 360 I really don't view the Wii as a RPG heavy console. by my count the Wii has: TOS2, ToG, Arc Rise Fantasia, Rune Factory Frontier, Fragile Dreams, Crystal Bearers (which is stretching it) Muramasa, and Xenoblade and The Last Story for future releases (only counting JRPG's though the WRPGs are slim on Wii).

    Where the PS3 has: Valkyria Chronicles, Eternal Sonata, NieR, White Knight,Resonance of Fate, Star Ocean 4, Demon Souls, 3D Dot Heroes, Final Fantasy XIII, Enchanted Arms, Disgaea 3, Trinity Universe, Cross Edge, Tales of Vesperia with Trinity: Souls of Zill Oll, Final Fantasy 13 Versus, Tales of Graces F, Tales of Unitia (or whatever they call it) Disgaea 4, Atelier Rorona, Atelier Totori, Ar Tonelico 3, Agarest War, and others Im likely forgetting as future releases, and thats again just JRPG's

  • lostinblue

    You're missing a few, whereas in PS3 you're missing none important; including ones I wouldn't purchase; and some that weren't released outside japan and it's unlikely that they will) in short, that's sort of a inflated list in itself.

    Chocobo's Dungeon is a nice mysterious dungeon game, albeit with presentation value flaws at times (the sound sync with dialogue) it's endearing and has nice graphics, shiren 3 is the best mysterious dungeon game this gen, Final Fantasy IV The After is only available on Wiiware as is My Life as a King and Little King Story is awesome.

    Phantom Brave Wii and Sakura Wars V are ports but are worthy to be mentioned and if you mentioned Disgaea you have to count Fire Emblem, the king of “serious” SRPG's. And if you're into mysterious dungeon games, there's also Baroque.

    Lastly but not least: Opoona is a game by artepiazza the guys whoose throughout their whole carrer only did Dragon Quest. The guys that did DQIII and DQVII and were involved in the DS remakes. The result is a game that looks and fels Dragon Quest but was slammed by the reviews because it lacks the name. It's a great game, albeit light hearted next to a DQ.

    Monster Hunter 3.

    (I am not including Harvest Moons, Valhalla Knights, western RPG's that feel like JRPG's like Spectrobes and Monster Lab, upcoming games or games that were left in Japan such as Zangeki, Takt of Magic or Bonds of gold)

    I also don't know for sure if I consider 3D Dot Heroes to be a RPG, it's more like old zelda to me.

    There's lot of good games who were absent from your list on the Wii field. For the record though, I don't think either console is “RPG heavy” they're both merely ok.

    I'll say that Wii RPG's so far interest me more than PS3 ones though, I have ToV for the X360 so I think namco is stupid for not bringing it over but I'm not hurt by it; ToG and the new Tales probably won't come, but if they do… Graces is also on the Wii and I count they release it as well. so that's one game… And other than that, I have a soft spot for Demon Souls, Valkyria Chronicles, 3D Dot Heroes (even though I don't think that's an RPG), disgaea III and perhaps Ar Tonelico 3.

  • lostinblue

    There was no Namco EU back then. The game was brought by Ubisoft; since the game didn't have extra content (hence why sony us wouldn't allow it to be released here) they just applied the PSone script to it and voilá.

  • thebanditking

    Anyone else catch Bamco's latest goof? Check out this post from their facebook page:

    To all Tales fans! We are ecstatic to see all of your responses. Thanks for your loyalty and passion towards the game. Unfortunately we do not have any plans to localize the series at this time. We’ll be sure to let you know if there are any changes to the plans. Thanks again for your support.

    notice how its say “no plans to localize the SERIES” after much fan hate ans nasty messages the post was removed, very concerning to say the least that they would official state something like that regarding an entire series. Looks like Tales fans really are doomed T T

Video game stories from other sites on the web. These links leave Siliconera.

Popular