<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Starfox 64 coming to the Wii this month?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.siliconera.com/2007/03/12/starfox-64-coming-to-the-wii-this-month/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2007/03/12/starfox-64-coming-to-the-wii-this-month/</link> <description>The secret level in the world of video game news.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 01:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Veilknight</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2007/03/12/starfox-64-coming-to-the-wii-this-month/comment-page-1/#comment-55874</link> <dc:creator>Veilknight</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 19:56:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/index.php/2007/03/12/starfox-64-coming-to-the-wii-this-month/#comment-55874</guid> <description>Nintendo is definitely making a huge disservice to Starfox 64 by taking out the rumble. Essentially, that&#039;s getting only half the experience, as along with the voice acting (love it or hate) they&#039;re taking away what made the game so memorable back in the day.Really, with no rumble support, many N64 games (including OoT) lost some of the charm that made them unique and standout in the first place, even if the game plays the same for the most part.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nintendo is definitely making a huge disservice to Starfox 64 by taking out the rumble. Essentially, that&#8217;s getting only half the experience, as along with the voice acting (love it or hate) they&#8217;re taking away what made the game so memorable back in the day.</p><p>Really, with no rumble support, many N64 games (including OoT) lost some of the charm that made them unique and standout in the first place, even if the game plays the same for the most part.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Veilknight</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2007/03/12/starfox-64-coming-to-the-wii-this-month/comment-page-1/#comment-667547</link> <dc:creator>Veilknight</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 19:56:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/index.php/2007/03/12/starfox-64-coming-to-the-wii-this-month/#comment-667547</guid> <description>Nintendo is definitely making a huge disservice to Starfox 64 by taking out the rumble. Essentially, that&#039;s getting only half the experience, as along with the voice acting (love it or hate) they&#039;re taking away what made the game so memorable back in the day.Really, with no rumble support, many N64 games (including OoT) lost some of the charm that made them unique and standout in the first place, even if the game plays the same for the most part.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nintendo is definitely making a huge disservice to Starfox 64 by taking out the rumble. Essentially, that&#8217;s getting only half the experience, as along with the voice acting (love it or hate) they&#8217;re taking away what made the game so memorable back in the day.</p><p>Really, with no rumble support, many N64 games (including OoT) lost some of the charm that made them unique and standout in the first place, even if the game plays the same for the most part.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: the_importer</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2007/03/12/starfox-64-coming-to-the-wii-this-month/comment-page-1/#comment-55777</link> <dc:creator>the_importer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 10:11:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/index.php/2007/03/12/starfox-64-coming-to-the-wii-this-month/#comment-55777</guid> <description>Another good reason to wait for a real StarFox game for the Wii (the first being motion control).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another good reason to wait for a real StarFox game for the Wii (the first being motion control).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: the_importer</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2007/03/12/starfox-64-coming-to-the-wii-this-month/comment-page-1/#comment-667545</link> <dc:creator>the_importer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 10:11:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/index.php/2007/03/12/starfox-64-coming-to-the-wii-this-month/#comment-667545</guid> <description>Another good reason to wait for a real StarFox game for the Wii (the first being motion control).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another good reason to wait for a real StarFox game for the Wii (the first being motion control).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: the_importer</title><link>http://www.siliconera.com/2007/03/12/starfox-64-coming-to-the-wii-this-month/comment-page-1/#comment-667546</link> <dc:creator>the_importer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 10:11:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconera.com/index.php/2007/03/12/starfox-64-coming-to-the-wii-this-month/#comment-667546</guid> <description>Another good reason to wait for a real StarFox game for the Wii (the first being motion control).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another good reason to wait for a real StarFox game for the Wii (the first being motion control).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/11 queries in 0.032 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 435/439 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via storage.siliconera.com

Served from: www.siliconera.com @ 2012-02-11 20:13:11 -->
